The responses of autistic children to the distress of others

被引:114
作者
Bacon, AL
Fein, D [1 ]
Morris, R
Waterhouse, L
Allen, D
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06268 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Trenton State Coll, Trenton, NJ 08650 USA
[4] Yeshiva Univ, Albert Einstein Coll Med, New York, NY 10033 USA
关键词
preschool children; autism; prosocial behavior;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026040615628
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The behavior of preschool children from five groups (developmental language disordered, high-functioning autistic, low-functioning autistic, mentally retarded, and normally developing) were coded in three situations: presentation of a nonsocial orienting stimulus (an unfamiliar noise) and two social situations involving simulated distress on the part of an adult with whom they were playing. Cognitive level was correlated with level of responsiveness to stimuli only for the two retarded groups (mentally retarded and low-functioning autistic). Girls showed more prosocial behavior than boys in both social situations, independent of diagnosis. The language-disordered children showed only mild and subtle social deficits. The low-functioning autistic children showed pronounced deficits in responding in all situations. The mentally retarded and high-functioning autistic children showed good awareness of all situations, but were moderately impaired in their ability to respond prosocially; they rarely initiated prosocial behavior, but did respond to specific prompts. The behavioral feature that marked both autistic groups, in contrast to all other groups, was a lack of social referencing; they did not tend to look toward an adult in the presence of an ambiguous and unfamiliar stimulus. Results are discussed in terms of variability between and among high- and low-functioning autistic children, and implications for the core deficits in autism.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development
[3]  
BACHEVALIER J, 1994, NEUROBIOLOGY AUTISM, P146
[4]  
Baron-Cohen S, 1991, NATURAL THEORIES MIN, P233, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RIDD.2013.09.027
[5]  
Bauman M.L., 1994, NEUROBIOLOGY AUTISM, P119
[6]  
Bayley N., 1969, BAYLEY SCALES INFANT
[7]   AFFECT COMPREHENSION IN CHILDREN WITH PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS [J].
BRAVERMAN, M ;
FEIN, D ;
LUCCI, D ;
WATERHOUSE, L .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 1989, 19 (02) :301-316
[8]   ATTACHMENT SECURITY IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM [J].
CAPPS, L ;
SIGMAN, M ;
MUNDY, P .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 6 (02) :249-261
[9]   PARENTAL PERCEPTION OF EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIVENESS IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM [J].
CAPPS, L ;
KASARI, C ;
YIRMIYA, N ;
SIGMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 61 (03) :475-484
[10]  
Dunn L., 1997, PEABODY PICTURE VOCA