Wanting to travel, more or less: Exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel

被引:30
作者
Choo, S [1 ]
Collantes, GO [1 ]
Mokhtarian, PL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Inst Transportat Studies, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
affinity for travel; ordered probit; positive utility of travel; travel attitudes;
D O I
10.1007/s11116-004-2219-8
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates the determinants of people's desire to increase or decrease the amount of travel they do. We use data from 1,357 working commuters, residents of three different neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. The dependent variables are indicators of Relative Desired Mobility for ten categories of travel (short- and long-distance overall and by several mode- and purpose-specific categories). These variables are measured on a five-point ordinal scale ranging from "much less" to "much more", through which the respondents indicated the amount of travel they want to do (in the category in question) compared to what they are doing now. Censored ordered probit models were developed for these variables, with explanatory variables including general travel attitudes, specific liking for travel in each of the same separate categories, objective and subjective measures of the amount currently traveled in each category, and personality, lifestyle, and socio-demographic characteristics. The results support the hypotheses that the liking for travel has a strong positive impact, and subjective qualitative assessments of mobility have a strong negative impact, on the desire to increase one's travel. Finally, a number of general types of effects on Relative Desired Mobility were identified, among them complementarity and substitution effects. The results of this study can provide policy makers and researchers with new and valuable insight into key principles that affect individual travel demand.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 164
页数:30
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1976, BEHAV TRAVEL DEMAND
[2]  
Beaty S., 2000, TRANSPORT POLICY, V7, P207, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00026-3
[3]  
CAO X, IN PRESS TRANSPORT P
[4]   What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice [J].
Choo, S ;
Mokhtarian, PL .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2004, 38 (03) :201-222
[5]  
CHOO S, 2001, PUBLICATION
[6]   Personal travel management: The adoption and consideration of travel-related strategies [J].
Clay, MJ ;
Mokhtarian, PL .
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 27 (03) :181-209
[7]  
COLLANTES GO, 2002, PUBLICATION
[8]  
CURRY RW, 2000, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[9]  
Greene W. H, 1995, LIMDEP VERSION 7 0 U
[10]   THE LAW OF CONSTANT TRAVEL TIME AND TRIP-RATES [J].
HUPKES, G .
FUTURES, 1982, 14 (01) :38-46