Effect of bimatoprost on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are nonresponders to latanoprost

被引:79
作者
Gandolfi, SA [1 ]
Cimino, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Inst Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01891-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test the efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% 2D for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients affected by primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who did not respond to treatment with latanoprost 0.005% 2D. Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial with a cross over design (two 30-day treatment phases with a 30-day washout phase in between). Participants: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Random allocation to treatment to a single eye only of every subject. Eligibility criteria: (1) IOP > 22 mmHg in both eyes on current treatment (on three separate readings > 24 hours apart), (2) angle wide open in both eyes, (3) no pseudoexfoliation and/or pigment dispersion in either eye, (4) documented medical history consistent with < 10% IOP decrease in both eyes on 2-month treatment with latanoprost 0.005% every day. Method: The following variables were measured at each study visit: (1) IOP (Goldmann applanation tonometry, 5 readings, 8 AM, 12 noon, 4 Pm, 8 Pm, and 12 midnight); (2) visual acuity (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution); (3) estimate of conjunctival hyperemia based on 5 standard photographs (graded as "none" "trace," "mild," "moderate," and "severe"). Main Outcome Measure: IOP. Results: IOP data (mean and standard deviation) were the following: baseline = 24.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg, after washout = 24.8 +/- 1.1 mmHg, after latanoprost phase = 24.1 +/- 0.9 mmHg, after bimatoprost phase = 18.1 +/- 1.7 mmHg. IOP on bimatoprost proved lower than both baseline (P < 0.0001) and latanoprost (P = 0.0001). Thirteen of 15 patients showed a greater than or equal to 20% IOP decrease with bimatoprost treatment. None of the 15 patients showed a greater than or equal to 20% decrease of IOP after 30 days of latanoprost treatment. No significant IOP changes were observed in the fellow untreated eye in each patient throughout the study. Trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia was recorded more often with bimatoprost phase (P = 0.035). Conclusions. Thirteen of 15 patients, who were nonresponders to latanoprost, 0.005%, 2D, were successfully treated with bimatoprost, 0.03%, 2D. Bimatoprost treatment was associated with a higher incidence of trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia than latanoprost.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 614
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Effects on intraocular pressure and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost applied once daily, evening or morning - A comparison with timolol [J].
Alm, A ;
Stjernschantz, J ;
Widengard, I ;
Linden, C ;
Soderstrom, M ;
Nilsson, SE ;
Fristrom, B ;
Lindblom, B ;
Heijl, A ;
Gundersen, KG ;
Ehinger, B ;
Holmin, C ;
BengtssonStigmar, E ;
Aasved, H ;
Jangard, P ;
Ringvold, A ;
Vegge, T ;
Halseide, R ;
LundAndersen, H ;
Flesner, P ;
Thygesen, J ;
Airaksinen, J ;
Tuulonen, A .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) :1743-1752
[2]   Comparison of once- or twice-daily bimatoprost with twice-daily timolol in patients with elevated IOP -: A 3-month clinical trial [J].
Brandt, JD ;
VanDenburgh, AM ;
Chen, K ;
Whitcup, SM .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (06) :1023-1031
[3]   Effects of AGN 192024, a new ocular hypotensive agent, on aqueous dynamics [J].
Brubaker, RF ;
Schoff, EO ;
Nau, CB ;
Carpenter, SP ;
Chen, KK ;
Vandenburgh, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 131 (01) :19-24
[4]   Comparison of latanoprost and timolol in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma - A six-month, masked, multicenter trial in the United States [J].
Camras, CB ;
Cioffi, GA ;
VanBuskirk, EM ;
Fraser, J ;
Stewart, WC ;
Stewart, JA ;
Lustgarten, J ;
Schumer, RA ;
Podos, SM ;
Arroyo, M ;
Nitzberg, S ;
Ritch, R ;
Abundo, G ;
Caronia, R ;
Liebmann, J ;
Steinberger, D ;
Krupin, T ;
Rosenberg, LF ;
Ruderman, JM ;
Clarkson, K ;
Weinreb, RN ;
Ochabsi, R ;
Sherwood, M ;
Smith, MF ;
Stokes, DW ;
Zam, ZS ;
Wilensky, J ;
Hillman, D ;
Kaplan, B ;
Gates, V ;
Nail, C ;
Zimmerman, T ;
Fechtner, R ;
Fenton, R ;
Fenton, J ;
Higginbotham, EJ ;
Johnson, AT ;
PollackRundle, CJ ;
Weiss, E ;
Yablonski, ME ;
Tannenbaum, MH ;
Ibrahim, F ;
Ohia, E ;
Neely, D ;
Minckler, D ;
Heuer, D ;
Lee, P ;
Padea, M ;
Kaufman, PL ;
Heatley, GA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (01) :138-147
[5]   Three-month comparison of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension [J].
Gandolfi, S ;
Simmons, ST ;
Sturm, R ;
Chen, KK ;
Vandenburgh, AM .
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2001, 18 (03) :110-121
[6]   Latanoprost for uncontrolled glaucoma in a compassionate case protocol [J].
Patelska, B ;
Greenfield, DS ;
Liebmann, JM ;
Wand, D ;
Kushnick, H ;
Ritch, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 124 (03) :279-286
[7]   Structure-activity relationships and receptor profiles of some ocular hypotensive prostanoids [J].
Resul, B ;
Stjernschantz, J ;
Selen, G ;
Bito, L .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 41 :S47-S52
[8]   Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure [J].
Sherwood, M ;
Brandt, J .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 45 :S361-S368
[9]   The additive effect of latanoprost to maximum-tolerated medications with low-dose, high-dose, or no pilocarpine therapy [J].
Shin, DH ;
McCracken, MS ;
Bendel, RE ;
Pearlman, R ;
Juzych, MS ;
Hughes, BA ;
Schulz, LL ;
Kim, C ;
Baek, NH .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (02) :386-390
[10]   Comparison of brimonidine with latanoprost in the adjunctive treatment of glaucoma [J].
Simmons, ST ;
Samuelson, TW .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 22 (04) :388-399