Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma

被引:138
作者
Malpica, Anais
Deavers, Michael T.
Tornos, Carmen
Kurman, Robert J.
Soslow, Robert
Seidman, Jeffrey D.
Munsell, Mark F.
Gaertner, Erich
Frishberg, David
Silva, Elvio G.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Washington Hosp Ctr, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[6] Sarasota Pathol, Sarasota, FL USA
[7] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
grading; ovary; cancer; tumor; serous carcinoma; low-grade serous carcinoma; high-grade serous carcinoma; pathology; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; EPITHELIAL CARCINOMA; CLASSIFICATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0b013e31803199b0
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
Although grading has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic factor in ovarian serous carcinoma, there is no system universally used to perform this task. A few years ago, we proposed a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma that is based primarily on the assessment of nuclear atypia (uniformity vs. pleomorphism) in the worst area of the tumor. Tumor grade in this two-tier system is correlated with survival. After being used by numerous pathologists and trainees at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) for 15 years, we have observed that this system is user-friendly and reproducible. We undertook this study to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver variability among a group of 7 gynecologic pathologists and 2 general surgical pathologists using this grading system. A total of 80 cases of ovarian serous carcinoma, 40 low-grade and 40 highgrade, were circulated twice among these pathologists. Slides with examples of low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma were sent with the unknowns. A website was used to provide diagnostic criteria, images of examples of ovarian low-grade and high-grade carcinoma, and a log form to facilitate data entry. Statistical analysis demonstrated an overall kappa statistic among the different observers of 0.909. The intergrader kappa's ranged from 0.717 to 1.000 in the first round of the review and from 0.701 to 1.000 in the second round. Eight of the participants had an intragrader kappa ranging from 0.775 to 1.000 (excellent agreement), whereas a single participant had an intragrader kappa of 0.725 (good agreement). This study demonstrates that the two-tier grading system (the MDACC grading system) for ovarian serous carcinoma on the basis of the assessment of nuclear atypia kappa easy to learn and is highly reproducible. These findings would support its universal use, which would be beneficial for the standardization of clinical trials and protocols, thus facilitating the understanding of this disease and investigation into the treatment of patients affected by these tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1174
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1971, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, V50, P1
[2]
The prognostic significance of p53 expression quantitated by computerized image analysis in epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Anttila, MA ;
Ji, HX ;
Juhola, MT ;
Saarikoski, SV ;
Syrjänen, KJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 18 (01) :42-51
[3]
REPRODUCIBILITY AND PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF HISTOLOGIC TYPE AND GRADE IN EARLY EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
BERTELSEN, K ;
HOLUND, B ;
ANDERSEN, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1993, 3 (02) :72-79
[4]
Quantitative prognostic features in FIGO I ovarian cancer patients without postoperative treatment [J].
Brugghe, J ;
Baak, JPA ;
Wiltshaw, E ;
Brinkhuis, M ;
Meijer, GA ;
Fisher, C .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 68 (01) :47-53
[5]
TESTING THE VALIDITY OF A PROGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH SURGICALLY OPTIMAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA - A 15-YEAR REVIEW [J].
CAREY, MS ;
DEMBO, AJ ;
SIMM, JE ;
FYLES, AW ;
TREGER, T ;
BUSH, RS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1993, 3 (01) :24-35
[6]
CLEMENT PB, 2000, ATLAS GYNECOLOGIC SU, P289
[7]
[8]
Fleiss Joseph L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
[9]
GADDUCCI A, 1993, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V3, P226
[10]
Lee KR., 2003, World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs, P117