Cephalomedullary interlocked nail for ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures

被引:46
作者
Jain, P
Maini, L
Mishra, P
Upadhyay, A
Agarwal, A
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Orthopaed, New Delhi 110002, India
[2] Associated Lok Nayak Hosp, New Delhi 110002, India
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2004年 / 35卷 / 10期
关键词
cephatomedullary nail; ipsilateral hip; femoral shaft fractures;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.039
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
A retrospective study of the management of 23 cases of ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures, between January 1998 and December 2001, is presented. All except two cases were managed by a single implant, i.e. reconstruction nail. There was delayed diagnosis of femoral neck fracture in two cases where the "miss a nail" technique was used for fixation of the femoral neck fracture. All patients managed by reconstruction nail were simultaneously operated on for both fractures and operative treatment was executed as early as the general condition of the patient permitted. Delay in treatment was generally because of the associated injuries (head, chest or abdominal). There were 22 mates and 1 female patient with an average age of 34.5 years. Average follow-up was 30.9 months. There was one case of non-union of the femoral neck fracture, one case of avascular necrosis and one femoral. neck fracture united in varus. There were four cases of non-union and six cases of delayed union of femoral shaft fractures. Mean time for union of the femoral neck fracture was 15 weeks and for the shaft fracture was 22 weeks. In this series femoral shaft fracture determined the total union period. Complications involving the femoral. shaft fracture were more common than those related to femoral neck fractures. Shaft complications were more manageable with or without secondary procedures as compared to femoral neck complications, which usually require more extensive procedures. This stresses the need to realise the significance and seriousness of both components of this complex injury, in evaluation, management and post-operative care. We conclude that, though technically demanding, reconstruction nail is an acceptable alternative for management of concomitant fractures of the femoral neck and shaft with acceptable rates of complications and good results. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1038
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
A locked hip screw intramedullary nail (cephalomedullary nail) for the treatment of fractures of the proximal part of the femur combined with fractures of the femoral shaft [J].
Alho, A ;
Ekeland, A ;
Grogaard, B ;
Dokke, JR .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 40 (01) :10-16
[2]
Concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft - A meta-analysis of 659 cases [J].
Alho, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 67 (01) :19-28
[3]
BENNETT FS, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P168
[4]
A PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE WITH THE RUSSELL-TAYLOR RECONSTRUCTION NAIL FOR COMPLEX FEMORAL FRACTURES [J].
BOSE, WJ ;
CORCES, A ;
ANDERSON, LD .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 32 (01) :71-76
[5]
BUCHOLZ WR, 1985, ORTHOPEDICS, V8
[6]
CASEY MJ, 1979, J BONE JOINT SURG, V61
[7]
Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft [J].
Chen, CH ;
Chen, TB ;
Cheng, YM ;
Chang, JK ;
Lin, SY ;
Hung, SH .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2000, 31 (09) :719-722
[8]
Ipsilateral hip and distal femoral fractures [J].
Chen, CM ;
Chiu, FY ;
Lo, WH ;
Chuang, TY .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2000, 31 (03) :147-151
[9]
DELANEY W M, 1953, J Int Coll Surg, V19, P303
[10]
The treatment of difficult proximal femoral fractures with the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail [J].
Garnavos, C ;
Peterman, A ;
Howard, PW .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (06) :407-415