A systematic review of molecular and biological markers in tumours of the Ewing's sarcoma family

被引:42
作者
Riley, RD
Burchill, SA
Abrams, KR
Heney, D
Sutton, AJ
Jones, DR
Lambert, PC
Young, B
Wailoo, A
Lewis, IJ
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Leicester LE1 6TP, Leics, England
[2] St Jamess Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Oncol, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leicester, Dept Med Educ, Leicester LE1 9HN, Leics, England
[5] St Jamess Univ Hosp, Canc Res UK Clin Ctr, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Ewing's sarcoma; tumour marker; systematic review; prognosis; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00500-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to perform the first systematic review of molecular and biological tumour markers in tumours of the Ewing's sarcoma family (ESFT), and evaluate the current evidence for their clinical use. A well-defined, reproducible search strategy was used to identify the relevant literature from 1966 to February 2000. Papers were independently assessed for tumour markers used in the screening, diagnosis, prognosis or monitoring of patients with ESFT. Eighty-four papers studying the use of 70 different tumour markers in ESFT's were identified. Low-quality, inconsistent reporting limited meta-analysis to that of prognostic data for 28 markers. Patients with tumours lacking S-100 protein expression have a better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR)=0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19, 0.89) than those with expression; patients with high levels of serum LDH had a worse OS and disease-free survival (DFS) (OS: HR = 2.92, CI 2.16, 3.94, DFS: HR = 3.38, 95% C1 2.28, 4.99); patients with localised disease and tumours expressing type I EWS-FLI1 fusion transcripts had an improved DFS compared with those with other fusion transcript types (HR=0.17, 95% CI 0.079, 0.37). The knowledge base formed should facilitate more informative future research. Improved statistical reporting and large, multicentre prospective studies are advocated. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 30
页数:12
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Ahrens S, 1999, MED PEDIATR ONCOL, V32, P186, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199903)32:3<186::AID-MPO5>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-D
[3]  
Altman D.G., 2008, SYST REV HLTH CARE M, V323, P228, DOI [10.1002/9780470693926.ch13, DOI 10.1002/9780470693926.CH13]
[4]   REVIEW OF SURVIVAL ANALYSES PUBLISHED IN CANCER JOURNALS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
DESTAVOLA, BL ;
LOVE, SB ;
STEPNIEWSKA, KA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 72 (02) :511-518
[5]   Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer [J].
Altman, DG ;
Lyman, GH .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1998, 52 (1-3) :289-303
[6]  
AMBROS IM, 1991, CANCER, V67, P1886, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910401)67:7<1886::AID-CNCR2820670712>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-U
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926
[9]  
Aparicio J, 1998, CANCER J - FRANCE, V11, P306
[10]  
APARICIO J, 1997, ONCOLOGY HUNTINGTON, V55, P20