Urologic diseases in America project: Urolithiasis

被引:777
作者
Pearle, MS
Calhoun, EA
Curhan, GC
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Urol & Internal Med, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Channing Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Nephrol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
urinary tract; hospitalization; urinary calculi; cost and cost analysis; prevalence;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Purpose: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. Materials and Methods: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. Results: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15% and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40% between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43% between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29% and 41%, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50% increase since 1994. Conclusions: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 857
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
BLAYLOCK N, 1968, PATTERN UROLITHIASIS, P33
[2]
NIFEDIPINE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE IN FACILITATING URETERAL STONE PASSAGE - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY [J].
BORGHI, L ;
MESCHI, T ;
AMATO, F ;
NOVARINI, A ;
GIANNINI, A ;
QUARANTELLI, C ;
MINEO, F .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (04) :1095-1098
[3]
Chandhoke P S, 2001, Curr Opin Urol, V11, P391, DOI 10.1097/00042307-200107000-00009
[4]
NATURAL-HISTORY OF CALCIUM UROLITHIASIS [J].
COE, FL ;
KECK, J ;
NORTON, ER .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 238 (14) :1519-1523
[5]
A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Large bore versus small bore versus tubeless [J].
Desai, MR ;
Kukreja, RA ;
Desai, MM ;
Mhaskar, SS ;
Wani, KA ;
Patel, SH ;
Bapat, SD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) :565-567
[6]
Management of lower-pole caliceal stones [J].
Gerber, GS .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (07) :501-503
[7]
THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF ASYMPTOMATIC UROLITHIASIS [J].
GLOWACKI, LS ;
BEECROFT, ML ;
COOK, RJ ;
PAHL, D ;
CHURCHILL, DN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (02) :319-321
[8]
Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients [J].
Karami, H ;
Gholamrezaie, HR .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (05) :475-476
[9]
Current management of urolithiasis: Progress or regress? [J].
Kerbl, K ;
Rehman, J ;
Landman, J ;
Lee, D ;
Sundaram, C ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) :281-288
[10]
Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: Review of first 112 patients [J].
Limb, J ;
Bellman, GC .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) :527-531