Unbiased cut selection for optimal upper limits in neutrino detectors: the model rejection potential technique

被引:123
作者
Hill, GC [1 ]
Rawlins, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Phys, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
neutrino detectors; upper limits; statistics;
D O I
10.1016/S0927-6505(02)00240-2
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present a method for optimising experimental cuts in order to place the strongest constraints (upper limits) on theoretical signal models. The method relies only on signal and background expectations derived from Monte Carlo simulations, so no bias is introduced by looking at actual data, for instance by setting a limit based on expected signal above the "last remaining data event". After discussing the concept of the "average upper limit", based on the expectation from an ensemble of repeated experiments with no true signal, we show how the best model rejection potential is achieved by optimising the cuts to minimise the ratio of this average upper limit to the expected signal from the model. As an example, we use this technique to determine the limit sensitivity of kilometre scale neutrino detectors to extra-terrestrial neutrino fluxes from a variety of models, e.g. active galaxies and gamma-ray bursts. We suggest that these model rejection potential optimised limits be used as a standard method of comparing the sensitivity of proposed neutrino detectors. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 402
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Astrophysical neutrino event rates and sensitivity for neutrino telescopes [J].
Albuquerque, IFM ;
Lamoureux, J ;
Smoot, GF .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2002, 141 (01) :195-209
[2]  
CONRAD J, IN PRESS J PHYS D
[3]   The prompt lepton cookbook [J].
Costa, CGS .
ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2001, 16 (02) :193-204
[4]   INCORPORATING SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES INTO AN UPPER LIMIT [J].
COUSINS, RD ;
HIGHLAND, VL .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1992, 320 (1-2) :331-335
[5]   WHY ISNT EVERY PHYSICIST A BAYESIAN [J].
COUSINS, RD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1995, 63 (05) :398-410
[6]  
DEYOUNG TR, 2001, COMMUNICATION
[7]   PRELIMINARY REFERENCE EARTH MODEL [J].
DZIEWONSKI, AM ;
ANDERSON, DL .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1981, 25 (04) :297-356
[8]   Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals [J].
Feldman, GJ ;
Cousins, RD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1998, 57 (07) :3873-3889
[9]   On radio detection of ultrahigh energy neutrinos in Antarctic ice [J].
Frichter, GM ;
Ralston, JP ;
McKay, DW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1996, 53 (03) :1684-1698
[10]   PREDICTION FOR THE ULTRAHIGH-ENERGY NEUTRINO NUCLEON CROSS-SECTION FROM NEW STRUCTURE-FUNCTION DATA AT SMALL-X [J].
FRICHTER, GM ;
MCKAY, DW ;
RALSTON, JP .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 74 (09) :1508-1511