Growth and canopy characteristics of field-grown tomato

被引:90
作者
Scholberg, J
McNeal, BL [1 ]
Jones, JW
Boote, KJ
Stanley, CD
Obreza, TA
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Soil & Water Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Agron, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Gulf Coast Res & Educ Ctr, Bradenton, FL 34203 USA
[5] SW Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Immokalee, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s100870050017
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although detailed growth studies and yield analysis are common for agronomic crops, their application to horticultural crops is limited. Detailed growth measurements of field-grown tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were conducted at four Florida locations for two irrigation methods. Maximum rate of main-stem node development was approximate to 0.5 nodes d(-1) and leaf area index (LAI) increased exponentially with main-stem node number. Maximum LAI was attained 11 wk after transplanting, with values ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 and from 3.2 to 6.0 for drip-irrigated and subirrigated crops, respectively. Lower LAI values with drip irrigation were only partially related to wider row spacings. Final biomass (dry weight) ranged from 6 to 12 Mg ha(-1) and fruit dry weight harvest indices (fruit biomass/total above-ground biomass) ranged from 0.53 to 0.71. Average dry matter accumulation by roots, stems, and leaves accounted for approximate to 3, 23, and 17% of final biomass, respectively. Estimated radiation use efficiency (RUE) for tomato averaged 1.05 g dry weight MJ(-1) m(-2), with 50 to 60% light interception in the crop production area at LAI values of 4 to 5. At 11000 plants per ha, the rate of dry matter accumulation averaged 17.8 g d(-1) m(-2) during the linear growth phase, with instantaneous dry matter partitioning to fruits averaging 0.70 during the fruit-growth phase. Relationships between degree days, estimated cumulative intercepted radiation, and fruit yield accounted for much of the variation in fruit yields for these different seasons and locations throughout Florida.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 159
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U FLORIDA GAI
[2]   GROWTH OF TRICKLE-IRRIGATED TOMATO AS RELATED TO ROOTING VOLUME AND UPTAKE OF N AND WATER [J].
BARYOSEF, B ;
STAMMERS, C ;
SAGIV, B .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1980, 72 (05) :815-822
[3]  
Bennett J. M., 1993, Peanut Science, V20, P1, DOI 10.3146/i0095-3679-20-1-1
[4]   MODELING PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF ROW CROP CANOPIES [J].
BOOTE, KJ ;
PICKERING, NB .
HORTSCIENCE, 1994, 29 (12) :1423-1434
[5]  
*FAO, 1995, FAO YB PROD, V48
[6]  
*FLOR AGR STAT SER, 1996, VEG ACR PROD VAL
[7]   A MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION FOR CROP GROWTH BASED ON LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND LEAF-AREA EXPANSION [J].
GOUDRIAAN, J ;
MONTEITH, JL .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1990, 66 (06) :695-701
[8]  
Goudriaan J., 1994, MODELING POTENTIAL C, VVolume 240
[9]   DRY-MATTER PRODUCTION IN A TOMATO CROP - MEASUREMENTS AND SIMULATION [J].
HEUVELINK, E .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1995, 75 (04) :369-379
[10]  
HOCHMUTH GJ, 1996, EVALUATION MONOPOTAS