Inside large and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations

被引:6
作者
Lee, VE
Smerdon, BA
Alfeld-Liro, C
Brown, SL
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Amer Inst Res, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Max Planck Inst Human Dev & Educ, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1164393
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how enrollment size influences two organizational features of schools: curriculum and social relations. We interview teachers, principals, guidance counselors, and students in six public high schools (large and small schools in urban suburban, and rural locations) and three schools of choice: two Catholic schools (one large, one small) and a small public school. All school members saw size as important. In small schools, student head counts translated directly into revenue that "bought" faculty and facilities. In large schools, members worried about anonymity. Social relations were more personal in the small high schools, although sometimes to students' detriment. Curriculum offerings in the small public schools necessarily modest, were targeted toward the middle of the ability distribution. Although students in the large and small public schools were free to choose among a broad away of courses, the Catholic high schools offered a mostly academic curriculum to all students. Policy issues, especially about making schools smaller and basing the high school curriculum on a full "student choice model." are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 171
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, TURN POINTS PREP AM
[2]  
Barker R., 1964, Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior
[3]   SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT [J].
BIDWELL, CE ;
KASARDA, JD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1975, 40 (01) :55-70
[4]  
Bryk A.S., 1988, SCH COMMUNITY THEORE
[5]  
Bryk A.S., 1993, CATHOLIC SCH COMMON
[6]  
CHAMBERS JG, 1981, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V3, P29
[7]  
*CHIC ANN CHALL, 1995, REQ PROP INV REINV P
[8]  
Chicago Annenberg Challenge, 1994, SMART SCH SMART KIDS
[9]  
Conant James Bryant, 1959, The American high school today
[10]  
CRONINGER RG, 1997, THESIS U MICHIGAN AN