A Comparative Study of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol Initiation and 1-Year Mortality Among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis

被引:45
作者
Assimon, Magdalene M. [1 ,2 ]
Brookhart, M. Alan [2 ]
Fine, Jason P. [3 ]
Heiss, Gerardo [2 ]
Layton, J. Bradley [2 ,4 ]
Flythe, Jennifer E. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Kidney Ctr, UNC Sch Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens,Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
INCIDENT DIALYSIS PATIENTS; BETA-BLOCKER; KIDNEY-DISEASE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; INTRADIALYTIC HYPOTENSION; INVERSE PROBABILITY; RENAL-DISEASE; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.02.350
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Background: Carvedilol and metoprolol are the beta-blockers most commonly prescribed to US hemodialysis patients, accounting for similar to 80% of beta-blocker prescriptions. Despite well-established pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic differences between the 2 medications, little is known about their relative safety and efficacy in the hemodialysis population. Study Design: A retrospective cohort study using a new-user design. Setting & Participants: Medicare-enrolled hemodialysis patients treated at a large US dialysis organization who initiated carvedilol or metoprolol therapy from January 1, 2007, through December 30, 2012. Predictor: Carvedilol versus metoprolol initiation. Outcomes: All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and intradialytic hypotension (systolic blood pressure decrease >= 20 mm Hg during hemodialysis plus intradialytic saline solution administration) during a 1-year follow-up period. Measurements: Survival models were used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs in mortality analyses. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs in intradialytic hypotension analyses. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for several demographic, clinical, laboratory, and dialysis treatment covariates in all analyses. Results: 27,064 individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis were included: 9,558 (35.3%) carvedilol initiators and 17,506 (64.7%) metoprolol initiators. Carvedilol (vs metoprolol) initiation was associated with greater all-cause (adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29). In subgroup analyses, similar associations were observed among patients with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and a recent myocardial infarction, the main cardiovascular indications for beta-blocker therapy. During follow-up, carvedilol (vs metoprolol) initiators had a higher rate of intradialytic hypotension (adjusted IRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). Limitations: Residual confounding may exist. Conclusions: Relative to metoprolol initiation, carvedilol initiation was associated with higher 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. One potential mechanism for these findings may be the increased occurrence of intradialytic hypotension after carvedilol (vs metoprolol) initiation.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 348
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
β-Blocker use in long-term dialysis patients -: Association with hospitalized heart failure and mortality [J].
Abbott, KC ;
Trespalacios, FC ;
Agodoa, LY ;
Taylor, A ;
Bakris, GL .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 164 (22) :2465-2471
[2]
Hypertension in hemodialysis patients treated with atenolol or lisinopril: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Agarwal, Rajiv ;
Sinha, Arjun D. ;
Pappas, Maria K. ;
Abraham, Terri N. ;
Tegegne, Getachew G. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 29 (03) :672-681
[3]
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (U.S.), 2013, DEVELOPING PROTOCOL
[4]
Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (30) :5642-5655
[5]
Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2009, 38 (06) :1228-1234
[6]
K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients [J].
Bolton, K ;
Beddhu, S ;
Campese, VM ;
Chavers, BM ;
Cheung, AK ;
Churchill, DN ;
Goldstein-Fuchs, J ;
Herzog, CA ;
Henrich, W ;
King, K ;
Kronenberg, F ;
Miholics, BS ;
Painter, PL ;
Parekh, R ;
Roberts, MS ;
Stehman-Breen, C ;
Stenvinkel, P ;
Wali, R ;
Weiss, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2005, 45 (04) :S7-S153
[7]
Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol on All-Cause Mortality and Hospitalizations in Patients With Heart Failure [J].
Briasoulis, Alexandros ;
Palla, Mohan ;
Afonso, Luis .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (08) :1111-1115
[8]
Variable selection for propensity score models [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Schneeweiss, Sebastian ;
Rothman, Kenneth J. ;
Glynn, Robert J. ;
Avorn, Jerry ;
Sturmer, Til .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (12) :1149-1156
[9]
Counterpoint: The Treatment Decision Design [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 182 (10) :840-845
[10]
Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Wyss, Richard ;
Layton, J. Bradley ;
Stuerner, Til .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2013, 6 (05) :604-611