Economic Shocks and Civil War

被引:114
作者
Chassang, Sylvain [1 ,2 ]
Padro i Miquel, Gerard [3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] NBER, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
SECURITY DILEMMA; CONFLICT; COOPERATION; MODEL; POWER; NEGOTIATIONS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1561/100.00008072
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article revisits the relationship between income per capita and civil conflict. We begin by documenting that the empirical literature identifies two different patterns. First, poor countries have a higher propensity to suffer from civil war. Second, civil war occurs when countries suffer negative income shocks. In a formal model we examine an explanation often suggested in the informal literature: civil wars occur in poor countries because the opportunity cost of fighting is small. We show that while this explanation fails to make sense of the first empirical pattern, it provides a coherent theoretical basis for the second. We then enrich the model to allow for private imperfect information about the state of the economy and show that mutual fears exacerbate the problem caused by negative income shocks.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 228
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 13964 NBER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, I EC PERFORMANCE
[3]   Arms races and negotiations [J].
Baliga, S ;
Sjöström, T .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2004, 71 (02) :351-369
[4]  
BLATTMAN C, 2009, J EC LIT IN PRESS
[5]   GLOBAL GAMES AND EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION [J].
CARLSSON, H ;
VANDAMME, E .
ECONOMETRICA, 1993, 61 (05) :989-1018
[6]  
CHASSANG S, 2008, 165 BREAD
[7]  
Ciccone A., 2008, TRANSITORY EC SHOCKS
[8]   On economic causes of civil war [J].
Collier, P ;
Hoeffler, A .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1998, 50 (04) :563-573
[9]   Greed and grievance in civil war [J].
Collier, P ;
Hoeffler, A .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2004, 56 (04) :563-595
[10]   A Model of Spoils Politics [J].
Dal Bo, Ernesto ;
Powell, Robert .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (01) :207-222