Effects of methylphenidate on attentional function after traumatic brain injury - A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

被引:128
作者
Whyte, J
Hart, T
Schuster, K
Fleming, M
Polansky, M
Coslett, HB
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Moss Rehabil Res Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Drucker Brain Injury Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, MossRehab, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[5] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[6] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
关键词
brain injury; attention; reaction time; methylphenidate;
D O I
10.1097/00002060-199711000-00002
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Attention deficits after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are common and disabling. Many pharmacologic agents have been used to ameliorate attention deficits, and considerable interest has focused on methylphenidate (MP) because of its documented efficacy in attention deficit disorder. However, clinical studies of MP in subjects with TBI have yielded mixed results. We examined the effects of MP on attentional function in individuals with TBI referred specifically for attentional assessment and treatment. Subjects were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated crossover design, using five different tasks designed to measure various facets of attentional function. MP produced a significant improvement in the speed of mental processing. Orienting to distractions, most aspects of sustained attention, and measures of motor speed were unaffected. These results suggest that MP may be a useful treatment in TBI but is primarily useful for symptoms that can be attributed to slowed mental processing.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 450
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   FULLY NONPARAMETRIC HYPOTHESES FOR FACTORIAL-DESIGNS .1. MULTIVARIATE REPEATED-MEASURES DESIGNS [J].
AKRITAS, MG ;
ARNOLD, SF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 89 (425) :336-343
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2
[4]   METHYLPHENIDATE AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING .1. DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN RESPONDERS AND NONRESPONDERS .2. EFFICACY IN RESPONDERS [J].
DESONNEVILLE, LMJ ;
NJIOKIKTJIEN, C ;
BOS, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 16 (06) :877-897
[5]  
Evans R. W., 1987, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V2, P29
[6]   TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CLOSED HEAD-INJURY WITH PSYCHOSTIMULANT DRUGS - A CONTROLLED CASE-STUDY AND AN APPROPRIATE EVALUATION PROCEDURE [J].
EVANS, RW ;
GUALTIERI, CT ;
PATTERSON, D .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1987, 175 (02) :106-110
[7]  
EVANS RW, 1986, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V90, P211
[8]  
Gray J.M., 1992, NEUROPSYCHOL REHABIL, V2, P97, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09602019208401399, 10.1080/09602019208401399]
[9]  
Gualtieri C T, 1988, Brain Inj, V2, P273, DOI 10.3109/02699058809150898
[10]  
Gualtieri C T, 1988, Brain Inj, V2, P101, DOI 10.3109/02699058809150936