Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale

被引:52
作者
Bjorner, JB
Petersen, MA
Groenvold, M
Aaronson, N
Ahlner-Elmqvist, M
Arraras, JI
Brédart, A
Fayers, P
Jordhoy, M
Sprangers, M
Watson, M
Young, T
机构
[1] Qual Metr Inc, Lincoln, RI 02865 USA
[2] Natl Inst Occupat Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Malmo Univ Hosp, MAS, ENT Dept, Malmo, Sweden
[7] Hosp Navarre, Dept Oncol, Pamplona, Spain
[8] Inst Curie, Psychiat & Psychooncol Unit, Paris, France
[9] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD, Scotland
[10] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Unit Appl Clin Res, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[11] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[12] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey, England
[13] Mt Vernon Hosp, Lynda Jackson Macmillan Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
关键词
cancer; IRT; palliative care; prediction; quality of life; shortening of scales;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-004-7866-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As part of a larger study whose objective is to develop an abbreviated version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 suitable for research in palliative care, analyses were conducted to determine the feasibility of generating a shorter version of the 4-item emotional functioning (EF) scale that could be scored in the original metric. Methods: We used data from 24 European cancer studies conducted in 10 different languages (n = 8242). Item selection was based on analyses by item response theory (IRT). Based on the IRT results, a simple scoring algorithm was developed to predict the original 4-item EF sum scale score from a reduced number of items. Results: Both a 3-item and a 2-item version ( item 21 'Did you feel tense?' and item 24 'Did you feel depressed?') predicted the total score with excellent agreement and very little bias. In group comparisons, the 2-item scale led to the same conclusions as those based on the original 4-item scale with little or no loss of measurement efficiency. Conclusion: Although these results are promising, confirmatory studies are needed based on independent samples. If such additional studies yield comparable results, incorporation of the 2-item EF scale in an abbreviated version of the QLQ-C30 for use in palliative care research settings would be justified. The analyses reported here demonstrate the usefulness of the IRT-based methodology for shortening questionnaire scales.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1697
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
Aaronson NK., 1996, Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, V2, P179
[3]  
ALEXANDER DA, 1998, OXFORD TXB PALLIATIV, P187
[4]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PARSCALE IRT BASED T
[6]  
[Anonymous], CLIN AUDIT PALLIATIV
[7]   Development of a short osteoporosis quality of life questionnaire by equating items from two existing instruments [J].
Badia, X ;
Prieto, L ;
Roset, M ;
Díez-Pérez, A ;
Herdman, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (01) :32-40
[8]   ADAPTIVE EAP ESTIMATION OF ABILITY IN A MICROCOMPUTER ENVIRONMENT [J].
BOCK, RD ;
MISLEVY, RJ .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 6 (04) :431-444
[9]   MARGINAL MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF ITEM PARAMETERS - APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM [J].
BOCK, RD ;
AITKIN, M .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1981, 46 (04) :443-459
[10]  
BRUERA E, 1996, CANC TREATMENT REV, P3