Chapter 8: Plasma operation and control

被引:146
作者
Gribov, Y. [1 ]
Humphreys, D.
Kajiwara, K.
Lazarus, E. A.
Lister, J. B.
Ozeki, T.
Portone, A.
Shimada, M.
Sips, A. C. C.
Wesley, J. C.
机构
[1] ITER Org, Cadarache Ctr, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
[2] Gen Atom Co, San Diego, CA 92186 USA
[3] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, CRPP, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, Naka, Ibaraki 3110193, Japan
[6] FDA Close Support Unit, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[7] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, D-85748 Garching, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S08
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The ITER plasma control system has the same functional scope as the control systems in present tokamaks. These are plasma operation scenario sequencing, plasma basic control (magnetic and kinetic), plasma advanced control (control of RWMs, NTMs, ELMs, error fields, etc) and plasma fast shutdown. This chapter considers only plasma initiation and plasma basic control. This chapter describes the progress achieved in these areas in the tokamak experiments since the ITER Physics Basis (1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2577) was written and the results of assessment of ITER to provide the plasma initiation and basic control. This assessment was done for the present ITER design (15 MA machine) at a more detailed level than it was done for the ITER design 1998 (21 MA machine) described in the ITER Physics Basis (1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2577). The experiments on plasma initiation performed in DIII-D and JT-60U, as well as the theoretical studies performed for ITER, have demonstrated that, within specified assumptions on the plasma confinement and the impurity influx, ITER can produce plasma initiation in a low toroidal electric field (0.3 V m(-1)). if it is assisted by about 2 MW of ECRF heating. The plasma basic control includes control of the plasma current, position and shape-the plasma magnetic control, as well as control of other plasma global parameters or their profiles-the plasma performance control. The magnetic control is based on more reliable and simpler models of the control objects than those available at present for the plasma kinetic control. Moreover the real time diaonostics used for the magnetic control in many cases are more precise than those used for the kinetic control. Because of these reasons, the plasma magnetic control was developed for modern tokamaks and assessed for ITER better than the kinetic control. However, significant progress has been achieved in the plasma performance control during the last few years. Although the physics basis of plasma operation and control is similar in ITER and present tokamaks, there is a principal qualitative difference. To minimize its cost, ITER has been designed with small margins in many plasma and engineering parameters. These small margins result in a significantly narrower operational space compared with present tokamaks. Furthermore, ITER operation is expensive and component damage resulting from purely operational errors might lead to a high and avoidable repair cost. These factors make it judicious to use validated plasma diagnostics and employ simulators to 'pre-test' the combined ITER operation and control systems. Understanding of how to do this type of pre-test validation is now developed in present day experiments. This research push should provide us with fully functional simulators before the first ITER operation.
引用
收藏
页码:S385 / S403
页数:19
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Plasma response models for current, shape and position control in JET [J].
Albanese, R ;
Calabrò, G ;
Mattei, M ;
Villone, F .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2003, 66-68 :715-718
[2]   The linearized CREATE-L plasma response model for the control of current, position and shape in tokamaks [J].
Albanese, R ;
Villone, F .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1998, 38 (05) :723-738
[3]   Overview of recent experimental results from the DIII-D advanced tokamak programme [J].
Allen, SL .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2001, 41 (10) :1341-1353
[4]   A new shape controller for extremely shaped plasmas in JET [J].
Ambrosino, G ;
Ariola, M ;
Pironti, A ;
Sartori, F .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2003, 66-68 :797-802
[5]   Controlling extremely shaped plasmas in the JET tokamak [J].
Ariola, M ;
De Tommasi, G ;
Pironti, A ;
Sartori, F .
42ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :4611-4615
[6]  
ARSHAD S, 1996, 23 EPS C CONTR FUS C, V20
[7]   Plasma initiation stage analysis in tokamaks with transmak code [J].
Belyakov, VA ;
Lobanov, KM ;
Makarova, LP ;
Mineev, AB ;
Vasiliev, VI .
PLASMA DEVICES AND OPERATIONS, 2003, 11 (03) :193-201
[8]  
BOSAK K, 2003, P 30 EPS C CONTR FUS
[9]   Density and temperature profile modifications with electron cyclotron power injection in quiescent double barrier discharges on DIII-D [J].
Casper, T. A. ;
Burrell, K. H. ;
Doyle, E. J. ;
Gohil, P. ;
Lasnier, C. J. ;
Leonard, A. W. ;
Moller, J. M. ;
Osborne, T. H. ;
Snyder, P. B. ;
Thomas, D. M. ;
Weiland, J. ;
West, W. P. .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2006, 48 :A35-A43
[10]  
*CONTR SYST DES AS, 2004, 19RI13R01 ITER N