Sonication per se is not as deleterious to sperm chromosomes as previously inferred

被引:94
作者
Tateno, H
Kimura, Y
Yanagimachi, R
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Sch Med, Dept Anat & Reprod Biol, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Asahikawa Med Coll, Dept Biol Sci, Asahikawa, Hokkaido 0788510, Japan
[3] Fukushima Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fukushima 9601295, Japan
关键词
fertilization; IVF/ART; sperm; testes;
D O I
10.1095/biolreprod63.1.341
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although sonication is a simple way to immobilize ("kill") spermatozoa prior to injection into oocytes, this has been thought to be destructive to sperm chromosomes, Mouse and human spermatozoa were immobilized by sonication and kept in various media for up to 2 h, then their nuclei were individually injected into mouse oocytes for the analysis of chromosomes at the first cleavage metaphase, In both the mouse and human, incidence of structural chromosome aberrations was much higher in the spermatozoa sonicated and stored in Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium for 2 h at 37.5 degrees C than in those stored for 5 min in the same medium. We concluded, therefore, that it is not sonication per se but a prolonged exposure of sperm nuclei to extracellular milieu that is detrimental to sperm chromosomes. The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations of mouse and human spermatozoa was significantly reduced when the spermatozoa were sonicated and stored in K+-rich nucleus isolation medium containing EDTA, This suggests that sperm chromosome degradation following sperm immobilization by sonication is partly due to detrimental effects of a Na+-rich medium and of DNase on sperm chromatin. Ideally, it should be possible to prepare artificial media that maintain the integrity of sperm chromosomes for many hours after immobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 346
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ahmadi A, 1999, ARCH ANDROLOGY, V42, P1
[2]   Fertilization and development of mouse oocytes injected with membrane-damaged spermatozoa [J].
Ahmadi, A ;
Ng, SC .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (12) :2797-2801
[3]  
BABCOCK DF, 1983, J BIOL CHEM, V258, P6380
[4]  
Bedford J.M., 1974, Contributions Primatol, V3, P97
[5]  
Bedford JM, 1990, MARSHALLS PHYSL REPR, V2, P379
[6]  
Bellve A.R., 1983, P55
[7]  
BIGGERS J. D., 1971, Methods in mammalian embryology, P86
[8]   Meiotic and mitotic Ca2+ oscillations affect cell composition in resulting blastocysts [J].
BosMikich, A ;
Whittingham, DG ;
Jones, KT .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1997, 182 (01) :172-179
[9]  
Calvin H. I, 1971, Journal Reprod Fertil, VNo. 13, P65
[10]   COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR BASIC-PROTEINS IN RAT, HUMAN, GUINEA-PIG, MOUSE AND RABBIT SPERMATOZOA [J].
CALVIN, HI .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1976, 434 (02) :377-389