Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer

被引:376
作者
West, N. P. [1 ]
Anderin, C. [3 ]
Smith, K. J. E. [2 ]
Holm, T. [3 ]
Quirke, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Mol Med, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Gen Infirm, John Goligher Colorectal Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RISK-FACTORS; RESECTION; PERINEAL; ADENOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA; FLAP; RECONSTRUCTION; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.6916
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal cancer is associated with higher rates of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement and intraoperative perforation (IOPs) than anterior resection for higher tumours. This multicentre observational study was designed to confirm that extralevator APE can improve outcomes and investigated the morbidity associated with such extensive surgery. Methods: Some 176 extralevator APE procedures from 11 European colorectal surgeons were compared with 124 standard excisions from one UK centre. Clinical and pathological data were collected along with specimen photographs. Tissue morphometry was performed on the distal ten slices of the excision. Results: Extralevator APE removed more tissue from outside the smooth muscle layer per slice (median area 2120 versus 1259 mm(2); P < 0.001) leading to a reduction in CRM involvement (from 49.6 to 20-3 per cent; P < 0.001) and TOP (from 28.2 to 8.2 per cent; P < 0.001) compared with standard surgery. However, extralevator surgery was associated with an increase in perineal wound complications (from 20 to 38.0 per cent; P = 0.019). Conclusion: Extralevator APE is associated with less CRM involvement and TOP than standard surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 599
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, J CLIN PATHOL
[2]   Risk factors for impaired healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of rectum for carcinoma [J].
Artioukh, D. Y. ;
Smith, R. A. ;
Gokul, K. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (04) :362-367
[3]   Does laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum compromise long-term survival? [J].
Baker, RP ;
White, EE ;
Titu, L ;
Duthie, GS ;
Lee, PWR ;
Monson, JRT .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (11) :1481-1485
[4]   Therapeutic results in low-rectal cancer patients treated with abdominosacral resection are similar to those obtained by means of anterior resection in mid- and upper-rectal cancer cases [J].
Bebenek, M. ;
Pudelko, M. ;
Cisarz, K. ;
Balcerzak, A. ;
Tupikowski, W. ;
Wojciechowski, L. ;
Stankowska, A. ;
Tarkowski, R. ;
Szulc, R. .
EJSO, 2007, 33 (03) :320-323
[5]   Primary rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of perineal and vaginal defects after extended abdominoperineal resection [J].
Bell, SW ;
Dehni, N ;
Chaouat, M ;
Lifante, JC ;
Parc, R ;
Tiret, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (04) :482-486
[6]   Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure [J].
Bullard, KM ;
Trudel, JL ;
Baxter, NN ;
Rothenberger, DA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (03) :438-443
[7]   Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection [J].
Christian, CK ;
Kwaan, MR ;
Betensky, RA ;
Breen, EM ;
Zinner, MJ ;
Bleday, R .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (01) :43-48
[8]   Outcomes for abdominoperineal resections are not worse than those of anterior resections [J].
Chuwa, EWL ;
Seow-Choen, F .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (01) :41-49
[9]   Oncologic results following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum [J].
Dehni, N ;
McFadden, N ;
McNamara, DA ;
Guiguet, M ;
Tiret, E ;
Parc, R .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (07) :867-874
[10]  
Engel A F, 2003, Colorectal Dis, V5, P180, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00454.x