Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study

被引:285
作者
Lehman, Constance D.
Isaacs, Claudine
Schnall, Mitchell D.
Pisano, Etta D.
Ascher, Susan M.
Weatherall, Paul T.
Bluemke, David A.
Bowen, Deborah J.
Marcom, P. Kelly
Armstrong, Deborah K.
Domchek, Susan M.
Tomlinson, Gail
Skates, Steven J.
Gatsonis, Constantine
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seattle Canc Care Alliance, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Dept Med, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Dept Oncol, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
[8] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Ctr Breast Care, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[13] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[14] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[15] Brown Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2442060461
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively determine cancer yield, callback and biopsy rates, and positive predictive value (PPV) of mammography, magnetic resonance ( MR) imaging, and ultrasonography (US) in women at high risk for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant, and informed consent was obtained. We conducted a prospective pilot study of screening mammography, MR, and US in asymptomatic women 25 years of age or older who were genetically at high risk, defined as BRCA1/ BRCA2 carriers or with at least a 20% probability of carrying a BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutation. All imaging modalities were performed within 90 days of each other. Data were analyzed by using exact confidence intervals (CIs) and the McNemar test. Results: A total of 195 women were enrolled in this study over a 6- month period, and 171 completed all study examinations (mammography, US, and MR). Average age of the 171 participants was 46 years +/- 10.2 (standard deviation). Sixteen biopsies were performed and six cancers were detected, for an overall 3.5% cancer yield. MR enabled detection of all six cancers; mammography, two; and US, one. The diagnostic yields for each test were 3.5% for MR, 0.6% for US, and 1.2% for mammography. MR, US, and mammography findings prompted biopsy in 8.2%, 2.3%, and 2.3% of patients, respectively. None of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The PPV of biopsies performed as a result of MR was 43%. Conclusion: Screening MR imaging had a higher biopsy rate but helped detect more cancers than either mammography or US. US had the highest false-negative rate compared with mammography and MR, enabling detection of only one in six cancers in high- risk women.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 388
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*AETN, AETN CLIN POL B BREA
[2]  
*AM COLL RADIOLOGY, 2003, ACR BREAST IMAG REP
[3]  
American Cancer Society, Breast Cancer Facts Figures
[4]  
Anton-Culver Hoda, 2003, Community Genet, V6, P171, DOI 10.1159/000078165
[5]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[6]  
*BLUE CROSS BLUE S, MAGN RES IMAG BREAST
[7]   Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Chen, MH ;
DeAngelis, GA ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Harms, S ;
Heywang-Köbrunner, SH ;
Hylton, N ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Lehman, C ;
Pisano, ED ;
Causer, P ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Smazal, SF ;
Stelling, CB ;
Weatherall, PT ;
Schnall, MD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2735-2742
[8]   Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk [J].
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Bartels, CCM ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Meijers-Heijboer, EJ ;
Crepin, CMG ;
van Geel, AN ;
Menke, M ;
Verhoog, LC ;
van den Ouweland, A ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Klijn, JGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :924-930
[9]   Incidental findings on sonography of the breast:: Clinical significance and diagnostic workup [J].
Buchberger, W ;
DeKoekkoek-Doll, P ;
Springer, P ;
Obrist, P ;
Dünser, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (04) :921-927
[10]   Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts [J].
Crystal, P ;
Strano, SD ;
Shcharynski, S ;
Koretz, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (01) :177-182