Intrathecal sufentanil (5 vs. 10 μg) for labor analgesia:: Efficacy and side effects

被引:23
作者
Norris, MC [1 ]
Fogel, ST [1 ]
Holtmann, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Sect Obstet Anesthesia, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE | 1998年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
intrathecal sufentanil; labor analgesia; respiratory depression;
D O I
10.1016/S1098-7339(98)90050-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives. Despite growing popularity, there are few studies examining the relative efficacy of different doses of intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and side effects of 5 and 10 mu g intrathecal sufentanil. Methods. Sixty-three healthy, laboring, term parturients less than or equal to 5 cm cervical dilation participated in this study. In a randomized, double-blind fashion, patients received 5 or 10 mu g intrathecal sufentanil as part of a combined spinal epidural technique. Patients rated pain, itching, nausea, and sedation on verbal analog scales before and every 10 minutes after drug injection. We also recorded maternal blood pressure and peripheral oxygen saturation before and every 10 minutes after drug injection. Before and 30 and 60 minutes after drug injection, we measured maternal end-tidal CO2. Results. Both doses of sufentanil provided adequate analgesia. Although 10 mu g sufentanil produced slightly more profound analgesia, the duration of pain relief did not differ between the two groups. Both drug doses were associated with significant increases in itching and end-tidal CO2. The 10-mu g dose was associated with more sedation and a greater decrease in SaO(2). Conclusions. Both 5 and 10 mu g intrathecal sufentanil provided adequate labor analgesia. Both doses were associated with measurable spinal (itching) and supraspinal (sedation, respiratory depression) side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 257
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   How common is respiratory depression in laboring patients who receive intrathecal sufentanil alone or following IV opioids? [J].
Atkinson, P ;
Huffnagle, HJ ;
Arkoosh, V ;
Leighton, B ;
Huffnagle, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) :A888-A888
[2]   RESPIRATORY ARREST AFTER 2ND DOSE OF INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL [J].
BAKER, MN ;
SARNA, MC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (01) :231-232
[3]   ITCHING AFTER EPIDURAL AND SPINAL OPIATES [J].
BALLANTYNE, JC ;
LOACH, AB ;
CARR, DB .
PAIN, 1988, 33 (02) :149-160
[4]  
COOPER M, 1993, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V79, pA1000
[5]  
COURTNEY MA, 1992, REGION ANESTH, V17, P274
[6]   ANALYSIS OF STATISTICAL TESTS TO COMPARE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE MEASUREMENTS AMONG GROUPS [J].
DEXTER, F ;
CHESTNUT, DH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (04) :896-902
[7]   Baricity, needle direction, and intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia [J].
Ferouz, F ;
Norris, MC ;
Arkoosh, VA ;
Leighton, BL ;
Boxer, LM ;
Corba, RJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (03) :592-598
[8]  
Ferouz F, 1997, ANESTH ANALG, V85, P1088
[9]   Dose response study of intrathecal sufentanil in laboring patients [J].
Foss, ML ;
Nelson, KE ;
DAngelo, R ;
Hood, DD ;
Eisenach, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) :A898-A898
[10]   Does dextrose affect analgesia or the side effects of intrathecal sufentanil? [J].
Gage, JC ;
DAngelo, R ;
Miller, R ;
Eisenach, JC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (04) :826-830