MR imaging for the detection of endoleaks in recipients of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with low magnetic susceptibility

被引:27
作者
Insko, EK
Kulzer, LM
Fairman, RM
Carpenter, JP
Stavropoulos, SW
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, MRI, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
aorta; grafts and prostheses; magnetic resonance (MR); vascular studies;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80060-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of endoleaks in recipients of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with low magnetic susceptibility. Materials and Methods. A retrospective search was conducted in radiology department records for cases of patients with low-susceptibility stent-grafts who had been evaluated with MR imaging and either computed tomography (CT) or conventional angiography within a 1-month time frame. Any endoleaks previously confirmed and classified with the use of CT and/or conventional angiography were compared with findings from MR imaging. Results. Nine patients fit the selection criteria. Images of five of those patients depicted six different endoleaks. Two endoleaks had been confirmed with CT, another two had been confirmed with CT and angiography, and two had been confirmed with angiography alone. All endoleaks visualized at CT and/or angiography were accurately detected and classified also with MR imaging. In some cases, the endoleak was more clearly visualized with MR imaging than with CT. In four patients in whom no endoleaks were found at CT, MR imaging also indicated no endoleaks. Conclusion. MR imaging is a suitable modality for identifying endoleaks in patients with low-susceptibility stent-grafts. Moreover, MR imaging may be more sensitive than CT for the detection of small endoleaks.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 513
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]
CT and MR arthrography of the normal and pathologic anterosuperior labrum and labral-bicipital complex [J].
De Maeseneer, M ;
Van Roy, F ;
Lenchik, L ;
Shahabpour, M ;
Jacobson, J ;
Ryu, KN ;
Handelberg, F ;
Osteaux, M .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 :S67-S81
[2]
Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endoluminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Engellau, L ;
Larsson, EM ;
Albrechtsson, U ;
Jonung, T ;
Ribbe, E ;
Thorne, J ;
Zdanowski, Z ;
Norgren, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 15 (03) :212-219
[3]
Diagnosis and treatment of type II endoleak after stent placement for exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Haulon, S ;
Willoteaux, S ;
Koussa, M ;
Gaxotte, V ;
Beregi, JP ;
Warembourg, H .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 15 (02) :148-154
[4]
Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms [J].
Haulon, S ;
Lions, C ;
McFadden, EP ;
Koussa, M ;
Gaxotte, V ;
Halna, P ;
Beregi, JP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 22 (01) :62-69
[5]
Parodi J C, 1991, Ann Vasc Surg, V5, P491, DOI 10.1007/BF02015271
[6]
Imaging of aortic stent-grafts and endoleaks [J].
Thurnher, S ;
Cejna, M .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (04) :799-+
[7]
Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: Summary of opinions expressed at an international conference [J].
Veith, FJ ;
Baum, RA ;
Ohki, T ;
Amor, M ;
Adiseshiah, M ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Buth, J ;
Chuter, TAM ;
Fairman, RM ;
Gilling-Smith, G ;
Harris, PL ;
Hodgson, KJ ;
Hopkinson, BR ;
Ivancev, K ;
Katzen, BT ;
Lawrence-Brown, M ;
Meier, GH ;
Malina, M ;
Makaroun, MS ;
Parodi, JC ;
Richter, GM ;
Rubin, GD ;
Stelter, WJ ;
White, GH ;
White, RA ;
Wisselink, W ;
Zarins, CK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1029-1035