The reliability of cause-of-death coding in The Netherlands

被引:114
作者
Harteloh, Peter [1 ]
de Bruin, Kim [1 ]
Kardaun, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Stat Netherlands, NL-2490 HA The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Mortality statistics; Cause of death; Coding; Reliability; Intercoder agreement; Intracoder agreement; CLASSIFICATION; MORTALITY; ACCURACY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10654-010-9445-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Cause-of-death statistics are a major source of information for epidemiological research or policy decisions. Information on the reliability of these statistics is important for interpreting trends in time or differences between populations. Variations in coding the underlying cause of death could hinder the attribution of observed differences to determinants of health. Therefore we studied the reliability of cause-of-death statistics in the Netherlands. We performed a double coding study. Death certificates from the month of May 2005 were coded again in 2007. Each death certificate was coded manually by four coders. Reliability was measured by calculating agreement between coders (intercoder agreement) and by calculating the consistency of each individual coder in time (intracoder agreement). Our analysis covered an amount of 10,833 death certificates. The intercoder agreement of four coders on the underlying cause of death was 78%. In 2.2% of the cases coders agreed on a change of the code assigned in 2005. The (mean) intracoder agreement of four coders was 89%. Agreement was associated with the specificity of the ICD-10 code (chapter, three digits, four digits), the age of the deceased, the number of coders and the number of diseases reported on the death certificate. The reliability of cause-of-death statistics turned out to be high (> 90%) for major causes of death such as cancers and acute myocardial infarction. For chronic diseases, such as diabetes and renal insufficiency, reliability was low (< 70%). The reliability of cause-of-death statistics varies by ICD-10 code/chapter. A statistical office should provide coders with (additional) rules for coding diseases with a low reliability and evaluate these rules regularly. Users of cause-of-death statistics should exercise caution when interpreting causes of death with a low reliability. Studies of reliability should take into account the number of coders involved and the number of codes on a death certificate.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Disease classification: measuring the effect of the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases on cause-of-death data in the United States [J].
Anderson, RN ;
Rosenberg, HM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (09) :1551-1570
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, CANC REGISTRATION PR
[3]  
BIRCH D, 1993, POPUL TRENDS, V15, P53
[4]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[5]  
Chen Linping, 2002, Aust Health Rev, V25, P189
[6]   NOSOLOGICAL CODING OF CAUSE OF DEATH [J].
CURB, JD ;
BABCOCK, C ;
PRESSEL, S ;
TUNG, B ;
REMINGTON, RD ;
HAWKINS, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1983, 118 (01) :122-128
[7]   Evaluation of cause-of-death statistics for Brazil, 2002-2004 [J].
Franca, Elisabeth ;
de Abreu, Daisy Xavier ;
Rao, Chalapati ;
Lopez, Alan D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (04) :891-901
[8]  
Giersiepen K, 1989, Offentl Gesundheitswes, V51, P40
[9]   THE AUTOPSY AS A MEASURE OF ACCURACY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE [J].
KIRCHER, T ;
NELSON, J ;
BURDO, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 313 (20) :1263-1269
[10]  
LEITNER B, 2006, CONTROL CODING AUSTR