Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals

被引:166
作者
Arzola, Cristian [1 ]
Davies, Sharon [1 ]
Rofaeel, Ayman [1 ]
Carvalho, Jose C. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000250912.66057.41
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound imaging of the spine has recently been proposed to facilitate identification of the epidural space. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and precision of the transverse approach, using a "single-screen" method, to facilitate labor epidurals. METHODS: We enrolled 61 patients requesting labor epidurals. Ultrasound imaging (transverse approach, 2-5 MHz curved array probe) identified the midline, the intervertebral space, and the distance from the skin to the epidural space (ultrasound depth/UD). During the epidural puncture, we recorded the success of the insertion point, and measured the distance to the epidural space to the nearest half-centimeter of the marked Tuohy needle (needle depth/ND). We calculated the agreement between UD and ND by the concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: The average maternal age was 33 +/- 4.6 yr, body mass index 29.7 +/- 4.8, UD 4.66 +/- 0.68 cm, and ND 4.65 +/- 0.72 cm. The success of the insertion point was 91.8%, with no need to redirect the needle in 73.8% of the patients. The concordance correlation coefficient between UD and ND was 0.881 (95% CI 0.820-0.942). The 95% limits of agreement were -0.666 to 0.687 cm. CONCLUSIONS: We found a good level of success in the ultrasound-determined insertion point, and very good agreement between UD and ND. This suggests that our proposed ultrasound single-screen method, using the transverse approach, can be a reliable guide to facilitate labor epidural insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:1188 / 1192
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
*ACOG, 2005, OBSTET GYNECOL, V106, P671, DOI DOI 10.1097/00006250-200509000-00054
[2]
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[3]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]
Towards complete and,accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379) :41-44
[5]
Agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from numeric rating scores of pain intensity and those reported by patients with acute or cancer pain [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Africano, JM ;
Polo, R ;
Alcala, R ;
Carr, DB .
PAIN, 2003, 106 (03) :439-442
[6]
Collier C B, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80070-7
[7]
Prevalence of maternal, obesity in an urban center [J].
Ehrenberg, HM ;
Dierker, L ;
Milluzzi, C ;
Mercer, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (05) :1189-1193
[8]
Frölich MA, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V93, P215
[9]
Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia [J].
Grau, T ;
Leipold, RW ;
Conradi, R ;
Martin, E ;
Motsch, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2002, 14 (03) :169-175
[10]
Paramedian access to the epidural space: The optimum window for ultrasound imaging [J].
Grau, T ;
Leipold, RW ;
Horter, J ;
Conradi, R ;
Martin, EO ;
Motsch, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2001, 13 (03) :213-217