Evaluating the quality of websites offering information on female hypoactive sexual desire disorder

被引:7
作者
Touchet, Bryan K. [1 ]
Warnock, Julia K.
Yates, William R.
Wilkins, Kirsten M.
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Tulsa, OK 74133 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00926230701385555
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study evaluates websites relevant to female hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). Its primary aim is to evaluate the quality of Internet HSDD information. One hundred and one websites, identified through simple Google searches, were scored using a tool incorporating expert consensus-derived quality criteria for HSDD. The tool included structural criteria such as currency, authorship, and disclosure of competing interests. It also included performance criteria, evaluating accuracy, and comprehensiveness, and was adapted from a published website evaluation tool for diabetes. For each website, a quality index score with a potential range from 1 to 5 (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) was calculated, and the websites were rank ordered using this score. Quality index scores ranged from 1.68 to 4.64, with 75% of websites scoring at or below 3.27. Test-retest reliability was moderate (n = 24, r = 0.6601, P =.0004). Rank ordering of the websites by quality index allowed identification of the top five highest quality websites. The majority of HSDD websites' quality scores fell in the score range from 1 to 3, indicating room for improvement in the quality of websites that address HSDD. Website evaluation tools utilizing both structural and performance quality criteria may help clinicians to assist their patients in assessing the quality of Internet health information.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 342
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[2]   Female androgen insufficiency: the Princeton consensus statement on definition, classification, and assessment [J].
Bachmann, G ;
Bancroft, J ;
Braunstein, G ;
Burger, H ;
Davis, S ;
Dennerstein, L ;
Goldstein, I ;
Guay, A ;
Leiblum, S ;
Lobo, R ;
Notelovitz, M ;
Rosen, R ;
Sarrel, P ;
Sherwin, B ;
Simon, J ;
Simpson, E ;
Shifren, J ;
Spark, R ;
Traish, A .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (04) :660-665
[3]   Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet - The case of carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Beredjiklian, PK ;
Bozentka, DJ ;
Steinberg, DR ;
Bernstein, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (11) :1540-1543
[4]   Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use? [J].
Bernstam, EV ;
Shelton, DM ;
Walji, M ;
Meric-Bernstam, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2005, 74 (01) :13-19
[5]   Reporting on post-menopausal hormone therapy: An analysis of gynaecologists' Web pages [J].
Bucksch, J ;
Kolip, P ;
Deitermann, B .
MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND THE INTERNET IN MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (3-4) :211-220
[6]   Can we trust cancer information on the Internet? A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites [J].
Ekman, A ;
Hall, P ;
Litton, JE .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2005, 16 (06) :765-772
[7]  
*EUR COMM, 2002, QUAL CRIT HLTH REL W
[8]   How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web?: Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews [J].
Eysenbach, G ;
Köhler, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7337) :573-577
[9]   Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web - A systematic review [J].
Eysenbach, G ;
Powell, J ;
Kuss, O ;
Sa, ER .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (20) :2691-2700
[10]  
Fox S., 2003, INTERNET HLTH RESOUR