Clinical results of microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

被引:10
作者
De Wildt, MJAM
Wagrell, L
Larson, TR
Eliasson, T
机构
[1] Univ St Radboud, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Urol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Urol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Urol, Umea, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2000.14.651
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a truly office procedure without the need for anesthesia for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Several devices have been developed. Continuous refinement of the procedure led to higher energy protocols and high-intensity dose protocols applying the heat-shock strategy. We report on the clinical results of these protocols. Symptom scores improve around 60%, whereas maximum urinary flow rate improve from an average 9 to 10 mL/sec at baseline to 14 to 15 mL/sec during follow-up. No significant differences have been shown between the outcomes with the different devices. Long-term data show satisfactory results after 4 years. Initial clinical results with the heat-shock strategy show results comparable to those of higher-energy protocols with decreased morbidity. Treatment morbidity of higher energy protocols is moderate and consists mainly of the need for catheterization and a higher percentage of retrograde ejaculation. To improve treatment efficacy, patient selection appears to be most important. Prostate size, bladder outlet obstruction, age, and prostate composition are of predictive value for treatment outcome. Further development of the treatment protocols and refinement of the urethral applicators might enhance outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 656
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostatron(TM) version 2.5) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized, controlled, parallel study [J].
Ahmed, M ;
Bell, T ;
Lawrence, WT ;
Ward, JP ;
Watson, GM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (02) :181-185
[2]   Transurethral microwave thermotherapy v sham treatment: Double-blind randomized study [J].
Blute, ML ;
Patterson, DE ;
Segura, JW ;
Tomera, KM ;
Hellerstein, DK .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (06) :565-573
[3]   How to select patients for high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy [J].
D'Ancona, FCH ;
Francisca, EAE ;
Hendriks, JCM ;
Debruyne, FMJ ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (01) :111-117
[4]   Results of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients categorized according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists operative risk classification [J].
D'Ancona, FCH ;
van der Bij, AK ;
Francisca, EAE ;
Kho, H ;
Debruyne, FMJ ;
Kiemeney, LA ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (02) :322-328
[5]  
D'Ancona FCH, 1998, BRIT J UROL, V82, P808
[6]  
d'Ancona FCH, 1999, PROSTATE, V40, P28
[7]   High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy for large severely obstructing prostates and the use of biodegradable stents to avoid catheterization after treatment [J].
Dahlstrand, C ;
Grundtman, S ;
Pettersson, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (06) :907-909
[8]   High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in men with lower urinary tract symptoms [J].
dAncona, FCH ;
Francisca, EAE ;
Debruyne, FMJ ;
delaRosette, JJMCH .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) :285-289
[9]  
DELAROSETTE JJM, 1993, CONT BPH MANAGEMENT, P77
[10]   Current status of thermotherapy of the prostate [J].
delaRosette, JJMCH ;
DAncona, FCH ;
Debruyne, FMJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :430-438