A positive theory of government debt

被引:40
作者
Martin, Fernando M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Econ, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
Government debt; Time-consistency; Markov-perfect equilibrium; MONETARY-POLICY; PUBLIC DEBT; INFLATION; WELFARE; DEFICITS; TAXATION; ECONOMY; FINANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.red.2009.02.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A government that cannot commit to future policy choices faces a trade-off that explains the level of debt. On the one hand, there is an incentive to increase debt and delay taxation, so as to reduce current distortions. On the other hand, inflating current prices lowers the real value of nominal debt and so there is a motive to reduce it now. The size of long-run debt will depend on the interaction of these two opposing incentives. The critical determinant is the willingness of households to substitute away from goods being taxed by inflation. Numerical simulations show that the model matches some qualitative and quantitative properties of U. S. policy variables, including the fact that wars are frequently financed with a mix of instruments. The theory interprets the unusual post-World War II inflation and fast liquidation of accumulated debt as being due to higher long-run debt and expenditure in the period leading up to the war. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 631
页数:24
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Transaction services, inflation, and welfare [J].
Aiyagari, SR ;
Braun, RA ;
Eckstein, Z .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (06) :1274-1301
[2]   Optimal taxation without state-contingent debt [J].
Aiyagari, SR ;
Marcet, A ;
Sargent, TJ ;
Seppälä, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 110 (06) :1220-1254
[3]   The optimum quantity of debt [J].
Aiyagari, SR ;
McGrattan, ER .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1998, 42 (03) :447-469
[4]  
ALESINA A, 1995, W4637 NBER
[5]  
[Anonymous], TIME CONSISTEN UNPUB
[6]   DETERMINATION OF THE PUBLIC DEBT [J].
BARRO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1979, 87 (05) :940-971
[7]   A dynamic theory of public spending, taxation, and debt [J].
Battaglini, Marco ;
Coate, Stephen .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01) :201-236
[8]   WHY DO WE HAVE NOMINAL GOVERNMENT DEBT [J].
BOHN, H .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1988, 21 (01) :127-140
[9]   The behavior of US public debt and deficits [J].
Bohn, H .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (03) :949-963
[10]  
Bohn H., 1992, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, V37, P1