Inferred ground motions on Guadeloupe during the 2004 Les Saintes earthquake

被引:14
作者
Douglas, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Bur Rech Geol & Minieres, ARN, RIS, F-45060 Orleans 2, France
关键词
ground-motion estimation; Guadeloupe; Les Saintes; ShakeMap; site effects; spatial correlation; strong ground motion; uncertainties;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-007-9037-2
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Accurate estimates of the ground motions that occurred during damaging earthquakes are a vital part of many aspects of earthquake engineering, such as the study of the size and cause of the uncertainties within earthquake risk assessments. This article compares a number of methods to estimate the ground shaking that occurred on Guadeloupe (French Antilles) during the 21st November 2004 (M-w 6.3) Les Saintes earthquake, with the aim of providing more accurate shaking estimates for the investigation of the sources of uncertainties within loss evaluations, based on damage data from this event. The various techniques make differing use of the available ground-motion recordings of this earthquake and by consequence the estimates obtained by the different approaches are associated with differing uncertainties. Ground motions on the French Antilles are affected by strong local site effects, which have been extensively investigated in previous studies. In this article, use is made of these studies in order to improve the shaking estimates. It is shown that the simple methods neglecting the spatial correlation of earthquake shaking lead to uncertainties similar to those predicted by empirical ground-motion models and that these are uniform across the whole of Guadeloupe. In contrast, methods (such as the ShakeMap approach) that take account of the spatial correlation in motions demonstrate that shaking within roughly 10 km of a recording station (covering a significant portion of the investigated area) can be defined with reasonable accuracy but that motions at more distant points are not well constrained.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 376
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ambraseys NN, 2005, B EARTHQ ENG, V3, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0
[2]   Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes [J].
Ambraseys, NN ;
Douglas, J .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 159 (01) :165-206
[3]  
Beresnev IA, 1996, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V86, P1964
[4]  
BERTIL D, 2005, RP54401FR BRGM
[5]   The influence of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modelling [J].
Bommer, Julian J. ;
Crowley, Helen .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 4 (03) :231-248
[6]   Style-of-Faulting in Ground-Motion Prediction Equations [J].
Bommer, Julian J. ;
Douglas, John ;
Strasser, Fleur O. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2003, 1 (02) :171-203
[7]   Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of the interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard Bridge collapse, west Los Angeles, California [J].
Boore, DM ;
Gibbs, JF ;
Joyner, WB ;
Tinsley, JC ;
Ponti, DJ .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (06) :2737-2751
[8]  
BOUR M, 2000, R40897 BRGM
[9]  
CAMPBELL KW, 1991, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V81, P1838
[10]   AN APPLICATION OF DISJUNCTIVE KRIGING FOR EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION ESTIMATION [J].
CARR, JR ;
DENG, ED ;
GLASS, CE .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1986, 18 (02) :197-213