Regulating the cancer-inducing potential of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Some lessons from the 1970s and 1980s

被引:10
作者
Abraham, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sociol Subjects Grp, Brighton BN1 9QN, E Sussex, England
关键词
drug regulation; carcinogenicity; scientific standards; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs;
D O I
10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00133-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article systematically examines government regulation of medicines in the U.K. and the U.S. with specific reference to carcinogenic risk assessment. By taking four non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as case studies, it is argued that there have been inconsistencies between regulatory practice and the scientific standards supposed to have been upheld by drug regulatory agencies. Moreover, those inconsistencies are shown to form a trend over time which suggests an erosion and neglect of regulatory rigour during the 1980 s. This takes the form of awarding the benefit of the many scientific doubts in carcinogenicity testing to manufacturers rather than to patients. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 51
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
*ABPI, 1977, GUID PRECL CLIN TE 1
[2]  
[Anonymous], FOOD ADDITIVES TAKIN
[3]  
BARNES JM, 1954, PHARMACOL REV, V6, P191
[4]  
BERRIDGE, 1995, COMMUNICATION
[5]   IS THE CLINICAL-TRIAL EVIDENCE ABOUT NEW DRUGS STATISTICALLY ADEQUATE [J].
BLAND, JM ;
JONES, DR ;
BENNETT, S ;
COOK, DG ;
HAINES, AP ;
MACFARLANE, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 19 (02) :155-160
[6]  
Chetley A., 1995, PROBLEM DRUGS
[7]  
COLLIER J, 1989, HLTH CONSPIRACY
[8]  
CROUT R, 1976, COMMUNICATION 0805
[9]  
DAY M, 1996, NEW SCIENTIST 1109, P10
[10]  
DHSS, 1979, MAIL 24 NOT GUID CAR