Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity:: Red list indices for birds

被引:327
作者
Butchart, SHM [1 ]
Stattersfield, AJ
Bennun, LA
Shutes, SM
Akçakaya, HR
Baillie, JEM
Stuart, SN
Hilton-Taylor, C
Mace, GM
机构
[1] BirdLife Int, Cambridge, England
[2] Appl Biomath, Setauket, NY USA
[3] Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London NW1 4RY, England
[4] Conservat Int, Ctr Appl Biodivers Sci, CI CABS IUCN SSC Biodivers Assessment Unit, Washington, DC USA
[5] IUCN SSC United Kingdom Off, IUCN Red List Programme, Cambridge, England
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The rapid destruction of the planet's biodiversity has prompted the nations of the world to set a target of achieving a significant reduction in the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010. However, we do not yet have an adequate way of monitoring progress towards achieving this target. Here we present a method for producing indices based on the IUCN Red List to chart the overall threat status (projected relative extinction risk) of all the world's bird species from 1988 to 2004. Red List Indices (RLIs) are based on the number of species in each Red List category, and on the number changing categories between assessments as a result of genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The RLI for all bird species shows that their overall threat status has continued to deteriorate since 1988. Disaggregated indices show that deteriorations have occurred worldwide and in all major ecosystems, but with particularly steep declines in the indices for Indo-Malayan birds (driven by intensifying deforestation of the Sundaic lowlands) and for albatrosses and petrels (driven by incidental mortality in commercial longline fisheries). RLIs complement indicators based on species population trends and habitat extent for quantifying global trends in the status of biodiversity. Their main weaknesses are that the resolution of status changes is fairly coarse and that delays may occur before some status changes are detected. Their greatest strength is that they are based on information from nearly all species in a taxonomic group worldwide, rather than a potentially biased subset. At present, suitable data are only available for birds, but indices for other taxonomic groups are in development, as is a sampled index based on a stratified sample from all major taxonomic groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2294 / 2304
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IUCN red list categories and criteria
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, IUCN Red List Categories
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, THREAT BIRDS WORLD 2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EC VAL REIN WAZ LOG
[6]   Measuring the changing state of nature [J].
Balmford, A ;
Green, RE ;
Jenkins, M .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (07) :326-330
[7]  
*BIRDL INT, 2004, GLOB THREAT BIRD FOR
[8]  
*BIRDL INT, 2004, STAT WORLDS BIRDS 20
[9]  
Birdlife International, 2000, Threatened Birds of the World
[10]   Time lag between deforestation and bird extinction in tropical forest fragments [J].
Brooks, TM ;
Pimm, SL ;
Oyugi, JO .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (05) :1140-1150