Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment

被引:46
作者
Abt, Eileen [1 ]
Rodricks, Joseph V. [2 ]
Levy, Jonathan I. [3 ]
Zeise, Lauren [4 ]
Burke, Thomas A. [5 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Board Environm Studies & Toxicol, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[2] ENVIRON Int Corp, Arlington, VA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Calif Environm Protect Agcy, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Defaults; dose-response assessment; risk assessment; risk management; toxicity; uncertainty; variability;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01426.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Research Council (NRC) recently completed a major report, Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment, that is intended to strengthen the scientific basis, credibility, and effectiveness of risk assessment practices and subsequent risk management decisions. The report describes the challenges faced by risk assessment and the need to consider improvements in both the technical analyses of risk assessments (i.e., the development and use of scientific information to improve risk characterization) and the utility of risk assessments (i.e., making assessments more relevant and useful for risk management decisions). The report tackles a number of topics relating to improvements in the process, including the design and framing of risk assessments, uncertainty and variability characterization, selection and use of defaults, unification of cancer and noncancer dose-response assessment, cumulative risk assessment, and the need to increase EPA's capacity to address these improvements. This article describes and summarizes the NRC report, with an eye toward its implications for risk assessment practices at EPA.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1036
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Linear Low-Dose Extrapolation for Noncancer Responses Is Not Generally Appropriate Response [J].
Burke, Thomas A. ;
Dominici, Francesca ;
Fox, Mary ;
White, Ronald H. ;
Cote, Ila ;
Hattis, Dale B. ;
Samet, Jonathan M. ;
White, Paul D. ;
Zeise, Lauren .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 117 (04) :A142-A143
[3]   If cumulative risk assessment is the answer, what is the question? [J].
Callahan, Michael A. ;
Sexton, Ken .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (05) :799-806
[4]  
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2019, EPA600P02001F
[5]  
HEGSTAD M, 2008, INSIDE EPA, V29, P19
[6]  
HEGSTAD M, 2009, RISK POLICY REPORT, V16, P16
[7]  
*IPCS, 2006, M EXT IPCS CANC FRAM
[8]  
National Research Council, 2009, SCI DEC ADV RISK ASS
[9]  
NRC, 1983, RISK ASS FED GOV MAN
[10]   Linear Low-Dose Extrapolation for Noncancer Responses Is Not Generally Appropriate [J].
Rhomberg, Lorenz R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 117 (04) :A141-A142