The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals

被引:336
作者
Collie, A
Maruff, P
Darby, DG
McStephen, M
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Neurosci, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] CogState Ltd, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
practice effects; test-retest; cognition; serial assessment; CogState;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617703930074
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Performance on many cognitive and neuropsychological tests may be improved by prior exposure to testing stimuli and procedures. These beneficial practice effects can have a significant impact on test performance when conventional neuropsychological tests are administered at test-retest intervals of weeks, months or years. Many recent investigations have sought to determine changes in cognitive function over periods of minutes or hours (e.g., before and after anesthesia) using computerized tests. However, the effects of practice at such brief test-retest intervals has not been reported. The current study sought to determine the magnitude of practice effects in a group of 113 individuals assessed with an automated cognitive test battery on 4 occasions in I day. Practice effects were evident both between and within assessments, and also within individual tests. However, these effects occurred mostly between the 1st and 2nd administration of the test battery, with smaller, nonsignificant improvements observed between the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th administrations. On the basis of these results, methodological and statistical strategies that may aid in the differentiation of practice effects from drug-induced cognitive changes are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 428
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Anastasi A., 1988, Psychological testing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1080/13854049208404115
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Practitioner's guide to evaluating change with intellectual assessment instruments
[4]   Practice effects on commonly used measures of executive function across twelve months [J].
Basso, MR ;
Bornstein, RA ;
Lang, JM .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 13 (03) :283-292
[5]   Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms [J].
Benedict, RHB ;
Zgaljardic, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 20 (03) :339-352
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power for the social sciences, DOI DOI 10.1177/002224378101800104
[7]   Determining the extent of cognitive change after coronary surgery: A review of statistical procedures [J].
Collie, A ;
Darby, DG ;
Falleti, MG ;
Silbert, BS ;
Maruff, P .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (06) :2005-2011
[8]   Memory decline in healthy older people - Implications for identifying mild cognitive impairment [J].
Collie, A ;
Maruff, P ;
Shafiq-Antonacci, R ;
Smith, M ;
Hallup, M ;
Schofield, PR ;
Masters, CL ;
Currie, J .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (11) :1533-1538
[9]   Computerised cognitive assessment of athletes with sports related head injury [J].
Collie, A ;
Darby, D ;
Maruff, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 35 (05) :297-302
[10]   Fatigue, alcohol and performance impairment [J].
Dawson, D ;
Reid, K .
NATURE, 1997, 388 (6639) :235-235