Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition

被引:126
作者
El Ouardighi, Fouad [1 ]
Kim, Bowon [2 ]
机构
[1] ESSEC Business Sch, F-95021 Cergy Pontoise, France
[2] KAIST Grad Sch Management, Seoul 130722, South Korea
关键词
Design quality; Supply quality management; Horizontal competition; Wholesale price contract; Revenue sharing contract; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.035
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In a number of industries (e.g., the airplane industry, aerospace industry, auto industry, or computer industry), certain suppliers essentially have a monopoly on the production technology for key components, and inevitably manufacturers in these industries have common suppliers. A key part of manufacturers' work with suppliers concerns improving the quality of their respective products, which gives rise to a collaborative activity usually termed as "supply quality management". When the manufacturers are competitors, they do not wish to see a common supplier dividing his involvement in quality improvement unequally between themselves and their rivals. However, as the suppliers collaborate with several manufacturers, it is highly questionable whether their efforts will be strictly equivalent for each manufacturer. In this paper, a non-cooperative dynamic game is formulated in which a single supplier collaborates with two manufacturers on design quality improvements for their respective products. The manufacturers compete for market demand both on price and design quality. The paper analyzes how each party should allocate resources for quality improvement over time. In order to take into account the potential coordinating power of the compensation scheme adopted in this type of decentralized setting, we compare the possible outcomes under a wholesale price contract and a revenue-sharing contract. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 340
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIFFERENTIAL GAMES E
[2]  
[Anonymous], MASTERING COMPLEXITY
[3]   DEALER AND MANUFACTURER MARGINS [J].
BRESNAHAN, TF ;
REISS, PC .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1985, 16 (02) :253-268
[4]   Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (01) :30-44
[5]  
CACHON GP, 2001, HARVARD BUSINES 0320
[6]   Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers [J].
Chen, FR ;
Federgruen, A ;
Zheng, YS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (05) :693-708
[7]   Quality choice and vertical integration [J].
Economides, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1999, 17 (06) :903-914
[8]   Quality improvement and goodwill accumulation in a dynamic duopoly [J].
El Ouardighi, Fouad ;
Pasin, Federico .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 175 (02) :1021-1032
[9]   A DYNAMIC GAME OF OPERATIONS AND MARKETING MANAGEMENT IN A SUPPLY CHAIN [J].
El Ouardighi, Fouad ;
Jorgensen, Steffen ;
Pasin, Federico .
INTERNATIONAL GAME THEORY REVIEW, 2008, 10 (04) :373-397
[10]  
ELOUARDIGHI F, 2009, DYNAMIC GAME DECENTR