The cost effectiveness of universal antenatal screening for HIV in New Zealand

被引:21
作者
Bramley, D
Graves, N
Walker, D
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Community Hlth, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, London WC1, England
关键词
HIV; AIDS; cost effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; New Zealand; antenatal; screening;
D O I
10.1097/00002030-200303280-00013
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: To model the incremental costs and benefits of a universal antenatal HIV screening programme in New Zealand (NZ). Design: Cost effectiveness analysis, including only health service costs, using secondary data sources and expert opinion. Uncertainty assessed in multi-way sensitivity analyses. Setting: The NZ Health Care System. Subjects: Antenatal population of NZ. Intervention: Universal antenatal HIV screening programme. Main outcome measures: incremental cost per true-positive HIV case detected in mothers; incremental cost per HIV case avoided in babies; and incremental cost per discounted life-year gained, for mothers and babies, due to screening. Results: Using base case values the application of universal screening would cost an additional $NZ 723 607 ($US 307 917) and would lead to the identification of an additional 6.25 true-positive women. After terminations have been excluded, the screening programme would detect five HIV exposed babies. There would be 1.15 avoided cases of HIV infection in babies and a net gain of 41.97 discounted life-years, for mothers and babies combined. The cost per incremental HIV-positive woman detected was $NZ 115 859 ($US 49 301), HIV infected baby avoided $NZ 629 669 ($US 267 944) and discounted life-year gained $NZ 17 241 ($US 7336). Conclusion: The discounted cost per life gained in NZ compares favourably to estimates reported in studies of similar interventions in other developed countries and other health care interventions in NZ. The decision of whether to implement universal screening in NZ would be clarified if the prevalence of antenatal HIV infection was known and policy makers identified their willingness to pay for an additional life-year gained. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 748
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
*ACT SMOK HLTH, 2001, BUPR NRT PROM SMOK C
[2]   Cost effectiveness analysis of antenatal HIV screening in United Kingdom [J].
Ades, AE ;
Sculpher, MJ ;
Gibb, DM ;
Gupta, R ;
Ratcliffe, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7219) :1230-1234
[3]   The mode of delivery and the risk of vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 -: A meta-analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies [J].
Andiman, W ;
Boucher, M ;
Burns, D ;
Bryson, Y ;
Farley, J ;
Fowler, H ;
Gabiano, C ;
Galli, L ;
Hutto, C ;
Kind, C ;
Korber, B ;
Kovacs, A ;
Krogstad, P ;
Landesman, S ;
Lapointe, N ;
Lemay, M ;
Lew, J ;
Mandelbrot, L ;
Mayaux, MJ ;
Mellins, R ;
Minkoff, H ;
Mofenson, L ;
Nielsen, K ;
Newell, ML ;
Pardi, G ;
Peavy, H ;
Peckham, C ;
Read, J ;
Rother, C ;
Rudin, C ;
Scott, G ;
Semprini, A ;
Shearer, W ;
Simonds, R ;
Simpson, B ;
Stek, A ;
Tovo, PA ;
Tuomala, R ;
Van Dyke, R ;
Weedon, J ;
de Martino, M ;
Lindsay, M ;
Belair, S ;
Chan, L ;
Harris, D ;
Kalish, L ;
Muenz, L ;
Nugent, R ;
Schluchter, M ;
Durako, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (13) :977-987
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MMWR Recomm Rep, V47, P1
[5]  
*AUCKL DISTR HLTH, 2001, COST HIV INV
[6]  
*AUCKL STARSH HOSP, 2001, GUID PAED MAN INF BO, P1
[7]   ROUTINE PRENATAL SCREENING FOR HIV-INFECTION [J].
BARBACCI, M ;
REPKE, JT ;
CHAISSON, RE .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8743) :709-711
[8]  
BRADY H, 2001, STANDARD PROTOCOL CO
[9]  
Bramley D, 2002, NEW ZEAL MED J, V115, P24
[10]  
Chambers ST, 2001, NEW ZEAL MED J, V114, P513