The fate of soil organic carbon upon erosion, transport and deposition in agricultural landscapes - A review of different concepts

被引:160
作者
Kirkels, F. M. S. A. [1 ]
Cammeraat, L. H. [1 ]
Kuhn, N. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, IBED Earth Surface Sci, NL-1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Environm Sci, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Carbon sink/source; Soil redistribution processes; Soil carbon dynamics; Carbon sequestration; Controversy; Scale; TILLAGE EROSION; WATER EROSION; LAND-USE; SEQUESTRATION; REDISTRIBUTION; IMPACT; MATTER; SEDIMENT; CESIUM-137; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.023
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Erosion and deposition redistribute large quantities of sediment and soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural landscapes. In the perspective of global carbon cycling, the coupling between erosion processes and the fate of SOC is of particular interest. However, different concepts have been proposed to assess the impact of erosion-induced lateral and vertical carbon fluxes. On landscape scale, this resulted in contrasting conclusions if agricultural soils represent either a carbon sink or source. The large global area of arable soil and generally high erosion rates, make these insights important. In this review, we aim to give an overview of the different conceptual relations described governing C dynamics at sites of erosion, along the transport pathway and at depositional sites and the current state of knowledge on the fate of SOC upon erosion, transport and deposition in agricultural landscapes. The impact of erosion on SOC dynamics differs for sites of erosion, deposition and during transport, with further influences by agricultural practices (e.g. tillage and fertilisation). Controlling processes are the detachment of sediment and SOC, net primary production resulting in dynamic replacement and changes in mineralisation upon transport and deposition due to aggregate breakdown and deep burial, respectively. However, the exact magnitude and dominance of these processes are debated, resulting in a controversy whether arable land functions as a sink or source for atmospheric CO2. Global estimations range between a net sink strength of 0.06-1 versus a source of 0.27-1.14 Gt C yr(-1) for agricultural soils. An eco-geomorphologic approach, which encompasses physical- and biological-driven factors (e.g. spatio-temporal variation in biological, geomorphological and biological processes, environmental conditions, mineralisation, and net primary production) is of importance to balance the carbon budget and ascertain sink or source formation at landscape scale. High spatio-temporal variability on process-scale imposes constrains, to measure and model the fate of SOC upon erosion, with limited quantitative data available. Prospective research across the landscape (eroding sites, transport pathway, and depositional sites) should include all relevant processes at broad temporal and spatial scales. Definitive resolution of the sink/source controversy lies in further eco-geomorphologic research on the fate of SOC, focussing on long-term and spatial extensive monitoring studies, combined with advanced measuring, modelling and extrapolation techniques to cover broad spatio-temporal SOC dynamics. Ascertainment of carbon dynamics in agricultural landscapes provides important insights to balance the carbon budget and finally holds the answer on sink/source formation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 105
页数:12
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SOIL EROSION CONSERV, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2389.2005.0756F.X
[2]   The boundless carbon cycle [J].
Battin, Tom J. ;
Luyssaert, Sebastiaan ;
Kaplan, Louis A. ;
Aufdenkampe, Anthony K. ;
Richter, Andreas ;
Tranvik, Lars J. .
NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2009, 2 (09) :598-600
[3]  
Berhe A.A., 2005, BRESLAUER S
[4]   The significance of the erosion-induced terrestrial carbon sink [J].
Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw ;
Harte, John ;
Harden, Jennifer W. ;
Torn, Margaret S. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (04) :337-346
[5]   Persistence of soil organic matter in eroding versus depositional landform positions [J].
Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw ;
Harden, Jennifer W. ;
Torn, Margaret S. ;
Kleber, Markus ;
Burton, Sarah D. ;
Harte, John .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2012, 117
[6]   Decomposition of organic substrates at eroding vs. depositional landform positions [J].
Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2012, 350 (1-2) :261-280
[7]   Linking soil organic matter dynamics and erosion-induced terrestrial carbon sequestration at different landform positions [J].
Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw ;
Harden, Jennifer W. ;
Torn, Margaret S. ;
Harte, John .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2008, 113 (G4)
[8]  
Bernstein L, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P447
[9]   The role of terrestrially derived organic carbon in the coastal ocean: A changing paradigm and the priming effect [J].
Bianchi, Thomas S. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (49) :19473-19481
[10]   Separation of light and heavy organic matter fractions in soil - Testing for proper density cut-off and dispersion level [J].
Cerli, C. ;
Celi, L. ;
Kalbitz, K. ;
Guggenberger, G. ;
Kaiser, K. .
GEODERMA, 2012, 170 :403-416