Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction

被引:1096
作者
Dansinger, ML
Gleason, JA
Griffith, JL
Selker, HP
Schaefer, EJ
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Atherosclerosis Res Lab, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutr Res Ctr Aging, Lipid Metab Lab, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2005年 / 293卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.293.1.43
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Context The scarcity of data addressing the health effects of popular diets is an Important public health concern, especially since patients and physicians are interested in using popular diets as individualized eating strategies for disease prevention. Objective To assess adherence rates and the effectiveness of 4 popular diets (Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers, and Ornish) for weight loss and cardiac risk factor reduction. Design Setting, and Participants A single-center randomized trial at an academic medical center in Boston, Mass, of overweight or obese (body mass index: mean, 35; range, 27-42) adults aged 22 to 72 years with known hypertension, dyslipidemia, or fasting hyperglycemia. Participants were enrolled starting July 18, 2000, and randomized to 4 popular diet groups until January 24, 2002. Intervention A total of 1-60 participants were randomly assigned to either Atkins (carbohydrate restriction, n=40), Zone (macronutrient balance, n=40), Weight Watchers (calorie restriction, n=40), or Ornish (fat restriction, n=40) diet groups. After 2 months of maximum effort, participants selected their own levels of dietary adherence. Main Outcome Measures One-year changes in baseline weight and cardiac risk factors, and self-selected dietary adherence rates per self-report. Results Assuming no change from baseline for participants who discontinued the study, mean (SD) weight loss at 1 year was 2.1 (4.8) kg for Atkins (21 [53%] of 40 participants completed, P=.009), 3.2 (6.0) kg for Zone (26 [65%] of 40 completed,P=.002), 3.0 (4.9) kg for Weight Watchers (26 [65%] of 40 completed, P<.001), and 3.3 (7.3) kg for Ornish (20 [50%] of 40 completed, P=.007). Greater effects were observed in study completers. Each diet significantly reduced the low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio by approximately 10% (all P<.05), with no significant effects on blood pressure or glucose at 1 year. Amount of weight loss was associated with self-reported dietary adherence level (r=0.60; P<.001) but not with diet type (r=0.07; P=.40). For each diet, decreasing levels of total/HDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and insulin were significantly associated with weight loss (mean r=0.36, 0.37, and 0.39, respectively) with no significant difference between diets (P=.48, P=57, P=31, respectively). Conclusions Each popular diet modestly reduced body weight and several cardiac risk factors at 1 year. Overall dietary adherence rates were low, although increased adherence was associated with greater weight loss and cardiac risk factor reductions for each diet group.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Health advantages and disadvantages of weight reducing diets: A computer analysis and critical review [J].
Anderson, JW ;
Konz, EC ;
Jenkins, DJA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2000, 19 (05) :578-590
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, DR ATKINS NEW DIET R
[3]
ATKINS R, 1995, ATKINS NEW DIET COOK
[4]
Physicians guide to popular low-carbohydrate weight-loss diets [J].
Blackburn, GL ;
Phillips, JCC ;
Morreale, S .
CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 68 (09) :761-+
[5]
Diet, obesity, and cardiovascular risk [J].
Bonow, RO ;
Eckel, RH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (21) :2057-2058
[6]
Glycemic load and chronic disease [J].
Brand-Miller, JC .
NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2003, 61 (05) :S49-S55
[7]
A randomized trial comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women [J].
Brehm, BJ ;
Seeley, RJ ;
Daniels, SR ;
D'Alessio, DA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2003, 88 (04) :1617-1623
[8]
A LOW-FAT DIET DECREASES HIGH-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN (HDL) CHOLESTEROL LEVELS BY DECREASING HDL APOLIPOPROTEIN TRANSPORT RATES [J].
BRINTON, EA ;
EISENBERG, S ;
BRESLOW, JL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1990, 85 (01) :144-151
[9]
The Zone Diet phenomenon: A closer look at the science behind the claims [J].
Cheuvront, SN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2003, 22 (01) :9-17
[10]
Connor WE, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V337, P566