Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task

被引:190
作者
West, R [1 ]
Alain, C
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Psychol, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Rotman Res Inst Baycrest Ctr, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Stroop task; event-related brain potential; inhibitory control; fluctuation of attention;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02530-0
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The influence of task context and transient fluctuations in attentional control on neural processes supporting performance of the Stroop task was investigated using event-related brain potentials. Task context was manipulated by varying the proportion of congruent and incongruent trials across different blocks of trials, and fluctuations of attentional control were considered by examining differences between trials eliciting faster and slower responses. The amplitudes of the N450, thought to reflect the suppression of a conceptual level processing system, and a temporo-parietal slow wave, thought to index the processing of color information, were greater when trials were mostly congruent in comparison to when trials were mostly incongruent. These findings indicate that the neural systems supporting inhibition and color processing are modulated by task demands. For the N450 the effect of task context interacted with the efficiency of attentional control being present for those trials eliciting faster responses and not for those trials eliciting slower responses. This finding is consistent with those from a growing number of studies indicating that the neural systems supporting attentional control are transient in nature, tending to fluctuate in efficiency over time. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 111
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF ATTENTION USING THE STROOP TEST [J].
BENCH, CJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
GRASBY, PM ;
FRISTON, KJ ;
PAULESU, E ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
DOLAN, RJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (09) :907-922
[2]  
Bush G, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P270, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270::AID-HBM6>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-H
[4]   Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An (H2O)-O-15 PET study of Stroop task performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Mintun, M ;
Cohen, JD .
NEUROIMAGE, 1995, 2 (04) :264-272
[5]   ATTENTIONAL MODULATION OF NEURAL PROCESSING OF SHAPE, COLOR, AND VELOCITY IN HUMANS [J].
CORBETTA, M ;
MIEZIN, FM ;
DOBMEYER, S ;
SHULMAN, GL ;
PETERSEN, SE .
SCIENCE, 1990, 248 (4962) :1556-1559
[6]   Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations [J].
De Jong, R ;
Berendsen, E ;
Cools, R .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :379-394
[7]   Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior [J].
Duncan, J ;
Emslie, H ;
Williams, P ;
Johnson, R ;
Freer, C .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03) :257-303
[8]   THE STROOP EFFECT - BRAIN POTENTIALS LOCALIZE THE SOURCE OF INTERFERENCE [J].
DUNCANJOHNSON, CC ;
KOPELL, BS .
SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4523) :938-940
[9]   Task-related and item-related brain processes of memory retrieval [J].
Düzel, E ;
Cabeza, R ;
Picton, TW ;
Yonelinas, AP ;
Scheich, H ;
Heinze, HJ ;
Tulving, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (04) :1794-1799
[10]  
HASHER L, 1988, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V22, P122, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9