Daily surface UV exposure and its relationship to surface pollutant measurements

被引:36
作者
Barnard, WF
Saxena, VK
Wenny, BN
DeLuisi, JJ
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Marine Earth & Atmospher Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Hampton, VA USA
[3] NOAA, OAR, ARL, SRRB, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 53卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2003.10466134
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For the past 30 years, the stratospheric ozone layer has decreased in the Northern Hemisphere. The main effect of this ozone decrease was an expected increase in the UV radiation at the Earth's surface, but there has been no clear evidence of an increasing urban trend in surface UV. This study shows that specific air pollutants can reduce the increased surface levels of UV radiation and offers an explanation for why the expected surface UV increases have not been observed, especially in urban regions. A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) UV monitoring site at the University of California at Riverside combined with air pollution data from a site operated by the California Air Resources Board in Rubidoux, CA, provided the basis of this study. The 1997 South Coast Ozone Study (SCOS-97) provided three key ingredients: black carbon, PM10 concentrations, and collocated radiometric measurements. The Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) satellite data were used to provide the stratospheric ozone levels that were included in the statistical model. All of these input parameters would be used to test this study's hypothesis: the expected increase of surface UV radiation, caused by decreases in stratospheric ozone, can be masked by increases in anthropogenic emissions. The values for the pollutants were 7:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. averages of the instrument's values taken during summer 1997. A statistical linear regression model was employed using the stratospheric ozone, black carbon, PM,,, and surface ozone concentrations, and the sin (Theta) and cos (Theta). The angle Theta is defined by Theta = 2pi (Julian date/365). This model obtained a coefficient of determination of 0.94 with an uncertainty level (p value) of less than 0.3% for all of the variables in the model except ground-level ozone. The final model, regressed against a data set from a remote, western North Carolina. site, resulted in a coefficient of determination of 0.92. The model shows that black carbon can reduce the Diffey-weighted UV levels that reach the surface by as much as 35%, depending on the season.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ALBRITTON DA, 1994, 37 WORLD MET ORG
[2]  
ALBRITTON DL, 1998, SCI ASSESSMENT OZONE
[3]   Field validation of a semi-continuous method for aerosol black carbon (aethalometer) and temporal patterns of summertime hourly black carbon measurements in southwestern PA [J].
Allen, GA ;
Lawrence, J ;
Koutrakis, P .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (05) :817-823
[4]   Influence of air mass history on black carbon concentrations and regional climate forcing in southeastern United States [J].
Bahrmann, CP ;
Saxena, VK .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D18) :23153-23161
[5]   SPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS OF SOLAR UVB RADIATION AND ITS RELATIONS TO TOTAL OZONE, SO2, AND CLOUDS [J].
BAIS, AF ;
ZEREFOS, CS ;
MELETI, C ;
ZIOMAS, IC ;
TOURPALI, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1993, 98 (D3) :5199-5204
[6]  
BARNARD WF, 1994, STRATOSPHERIC OZONE, P287
[7]  
BLUMTHALER M, 1996, IRS 96 CURRENT PROBL, P853
[8]   NORTHERN MIDDLE-LATITUDE OZONE PROFILE FEATURES AND TRENDS OBSERVED BY SBUV AND UMKEHR, 1979-1990 [J].
DELUISI, JJ ;
MATEER, CL ;
THEISEN, D ;
BHARTIA, PK ;
LONGENECKER, D ;
CHU, B .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D9) :18901-18908
[9]   SOLAR ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS [J].
DIFFEY, BL .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 36 (03) :299-328
[10]   Effects of clouds and haze on UV-B radiation [J].
Estupinan, JG ;
Raman, S ;
Crescenti, GH ;
Streicher, JJ ;
Barnard, WF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D11) :16807-16816