Combined use of MRI and PET to monitor response and assess residual disease for locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:49
作者
Chen, XM [1 ]
Moore, MO
Lehman, CD
Mankoff, DA
Lawton, TJ
Peacock, S
Schubert, EK
Livingston, RB
机构
[1] Seattle Canc Care Alliance, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Ctr Brest, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
locally advanced breast cancer (LABC); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); positron emission tomography (PET); neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2004.07.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the hypothesis that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are complementary and valuable in monitoring response and assessing residual disease of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to determine if the combination of the two modalities was more accurate than either alone and could provide better guidance in patient management. Materials and Methods. Sixteen lesions in 15 women with LABC were evaluated with MRI, PET, and clinical breast examination (CBE) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pre- and posttherapy maximal tumor sizes on MRI and CBE and standard uptake values (SUVs) on PET served as the measurements for clinical response classification and residual disease assessment. Pathologic assessment provided the reference for macroscopic and microscopic pathologic tumor response and residual disease. Results. PET correctly predicted lack of pathologic response in five of six cases (83%); CBE predicted correctly in one of six (17%) cases, and MRI predicted correctly in zero of six cases. When PET predicted response, MRI defined the extent of macroscopic pathologic residual disease accurately in 9 of 10 cases (90%). When posttherapy MRI showed complete response (CR) in eight cases, macroscopic pathologic complete response (mCR) was observed in all eight cases (100%). Conclusion. Our study suggests that combined use of MRI and PET is complementary and offers advantages over CBE. PET was more accurate in predicting pathologic nonresponse. Complete response by MRI correlated well with macroscopic pathologic complete response. (C) AUR, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1124
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abraham DC, 1996, CANCER, V78, P91, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<91::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]  
American College of Radiology, 2003, ACR BI RADS MAGN RES
[4]   Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI [J].
Balu-Maestro, C ;
Chapellier, C ;
Bleuse, A ;
Chanalet, I ;
Chauvel, C ;
Largillier, R .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 72 (02) :145-152
[5]  
Bassa P, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P931
[6]   STAGING OF CANCER [J].
BEAHRS, OH .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1991, 41 (02) :121-125
[7]  
Belli Paolo, 2002, Rays, V27, P279
[8]   MRI phenotype is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer [J].
Esserman, L ;
Kaplan, E ;
Partridge, S ;
Tripathy, D ;
Rugo, H ;
Park, J ;
Hwang, S ;
Kuerer, H ;
Sudilovsky, D ;
Lu, Y ;
Hylton, N .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (06) :549-559
[9]  
FELDMAN LD, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P2578
[10]   Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy - Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-18 [J].
Fisher, ER ;
Wang, JP ;
Bryant, J ;
Fisher, B ;
Mamounas, E ;
Wolmark, N .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (04) :681-695