Identifying hypertension-related comorbidities from administrative data: What's the optimal approach?

被引:139
作者
Borzecki, AM
Wong, AT
Hickey, EC
Ash, AS
Berlowitz, DR
机构
[1] VAMC, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
administrative data; hypertension; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1177/106286060401900504
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective was to determine the best strategy for identifying outpatients with hypertension-related diagnoses using Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative databases. We reviewed 1176 outpatient charts from 10 VA sites in 1999, taking the presence of 11 diagnoses relevant to hypertension management as the "gold standard" for identifying the comorbidity. We calculated agreement, sensitivity, and specificity for the chart versus several administrative data-based algorithms. Using 1999 data and requiring 1 administrative diagnosis, observed agreement ranged from 0.98 (atrial fibrillation) to 0.85 (hyperlipidemia), and kappas were generally high. Sensitivity varied from 38% (tobacco use) to 97% (diabetes); specificity exceeded 91% for 10 of 11 diagnoses. Requiring 2 years of data and 2 diagnoses improved most measures, with minimal sensitivity decrease. Agreement between the database and charts was good. Administrative data varied in its ability to identify all patients with a given diagnosis but identified accurately those without. The best strategy for case-finding required 2 diagnoses in a 2-year period.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Hypertension control - How well are we doing?
    Borzecki, AM
    Wong, AT
    Hickey, EC
    Ash, AS
    Berlowitz, DR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (22) : 2705 - 2711
  • [2] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [3] ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES
    DEYO, RA
    CHERKIN, DC
    CIOL, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) : 613 - 619
  • [4] Fowles J B, 1995, Health Care Financ Rev, V16, P189
  • [5] Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000
    Hajjar, I
    Kotchen, TA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02): : 199 - 206
  • [6] Halpern J, 1996, MED CARE, V34, pMS55
  • [7] Hebert P L, 1999, Am J Med Qual, V14, P270, DOI 10.1177/106286069901400607
  • [8] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) : 159 - 174
  • [9] LEATHERMAN S, 1991, QUAL REV B NOV, P349
  • [10] LURIE N, 1992, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V43, P69