Synoptic and mesoscale study of a severe convective outbreak with the nonhydrostatic Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model

被引:15
作者
Erfani, A
Méthot, A
Goodson, R
Bélair, S
Yeh, KS
Côté, J
Moffet, R
机构
[1] Meteorol Serv Canada, Prairies Storm Predict Ctr, Winnipeg, MB R3C 4W2, Canada
[2] Meteorol Serv Canada, Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3, Canada
[3] Meteorol Serv Canada, Meteorol Res Branch, Dorval, PQ H9P 1J3, Canada
[4] Meteorol Serv Canada, Canadian Meteorol Ctr, Dorval, PQ H9P 1J3, Canada
[5] NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Data Assimilat Off 910 3, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00703-001-0585-8
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A nonhydrostatic 4-km version of the Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model, with detailed microphysics included, was used to forecast the initiation, development, and structure of a tornado-producing supercell storm that occurred near Pine Lake (Alberta, Canada) on 15 July 2000. Examination of observations and comparison with conceptual models indicate that this storm is a good example of supercell storms that regularly produce summertime severe weather over Alberta. It was found that the high-resolution model was able to reproduce the early initiation of convective activity along the Rocky Mountains foothills, as well as the rapid northeast-ward propagation towards the Pine Lake area and the subsequent intensification into a supercell storm. The general structures of the forecasted convective system correspond well with conceptual representations of such events. Overall, this high-resolution forecast of the Pine Lake supercell storm was a significant improvement over the current operational version of the GEM model (24 km), which was not able to intensify the foothills' convection into a supercell storm. Finally, it was found that the nonhydrostatic version of the model produces better trajectory and propagation speed of the convective system, as compared with the hydrostatic one.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 53
页数:23
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, SCI DESCRIPTION RPN
  • [2] Bélair S, 2000, WEATHER FORECAST, V15, P257, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0257:OIOTFC>2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Bélair S, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P2362, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2362:IOHROT>2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] BENOIT R, 1989, MON WEATHER REV, V117, P1726, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1726:IOATBL>2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Brooks H.E., 1993, The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, P97, DOI [10.1029/GM079p0097, DOI 10.1029/GM079P0097]
  • [9] BROWNING KA, 1976, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V102, P499, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710243303
  • [10] BROWNING KA, 1964, J ATMOS SCI, V21, P634, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0634:AAPTWS>2.0.CO