Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index

被引:65
作者
Bischoff-Ferrari, HA
Vondechend, M
Bellamy, N
Theiler, R
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Robert B Brigham Arthrit & Musculoskeletal Dis Cl, Div Rheumatol Allergy & Immunol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Aging, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Kantonal Hosp, Aarau, Switzerland
[4] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Ctr Natl Res Disabil & Rehabil Med CONROD, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[5] Triemli Stadtspital, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1136/ard.2003.019307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives: To validate the WOMAC 3.1 in a touch screen computer format, which applies each question as a cartoon in writing and in speech (QUALITOUCH method), and to assess patient acceptance of the computer touch screen version. Methods: The paper and computer formats of WOMAC 3.1 were applied in random order to 53 subjects with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The mean age of the subjects was 64 years ( range 45 to 83), 60% were male, 53% were 65 years or older, and 53% used computers at home or at work. Agreement between formats was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Preferences were assessed with a supplementary questionnaire. Results: ICCs between formats were 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.96) for pain; 0.94 (0.90 to 0.97) for stiffness, and 0.96 ( 0.94 to 0.98) for function. ICCs were similar in men and women, in subjects with or without previous computer experience, and in subjects below or above age 65. The computer format was found easier to use by 26% of the subjects, the paper format by 8%, and 66% were undecided. Overall, 53% of subjects preferred the computer format, while 9% preferred the paper format, and 38% were undecided. Conclusion: The computer format of the WOMAC 3.1 is a reliable assessment tool. Agreement between computer and paper formats was independent of computer experience, age, or sex. Thus the computer format may help improve patient follow up by meeting patients' preferences and providing immediate results.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P2413
[2]
Bellamy N, 2002, J RHEUMATOL, V29, P2473
[3]
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[4]
BELLAMY N, 1992, CLIN INVEST MED, V15, P427
[5]
Bischoff HA, 2003, OSTEOARTHRITIS, P381
[6]
Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. [J].
Buxton, J ;
White, M ;
Osoba, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (06) :513-519
[7]
Ehrich EW, 2000, J RHEUMATOL, V27, P2635
[8]
Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee [J].
Fortin, PR ;
Penrod, JR ;
Clarke, AE ;
St-Pierre, Y ;
Joseph, L ;
Bélisle, P ;
Liang, MH ;
Ferland, D ;
Phillips, CB ;
Mahomed, N ;
Tanzer, M ;
Sledge, C ;
Fossel, AH ;
Katz, JN .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (12) :3327-3330
[9]
Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement - A randomized trial [J].
Laupacis, A ;
Bourne, R ;
Rorabeck, C ;
Feeny, D ;
Tugwell, P ;
Wong, C .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (10) :1823-1828
[10]
Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC [J].
Lingard, EA ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, J ;
Wright, EA ;
Sledge, CB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (12) :1856-1864