When and Why Do Central Employees Speak Up? An Examination of Mediating and Moderating Variables

被引:120
作者
Venkataramani, Vijaya [1 ]
Tangirala, Subrahmaniam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
employee voice; personal influence; extrarole behaviors; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; NEGATIVE AFFECT; VOICE; BEHAVIOR; POWER; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0018315
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We examined the proposition that employees' work-flow centrality (i.e., the extent to which they are critical to the task-related interaction networks of their work groups) enhances their personal influence within their work groups and, therefore, motivates them to engage in voice behaviors. In support of this proposition, in a study of 184 bank employees nested within 42 work groups, we found that employees' work-flow centrality was positively related to voice behaviors, with their personal influence mediating this relationship. Further, work-flow centrality was more strongly related to personal influence when employees had higher task performance, and personal influence was more strongly related to voice behaviors when employees had higher levels of work-group identification. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 591
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Flynn, Francis J. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (03) :702-710
[2]   Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Srivastava, Sanjay ;
Beer, Jennifer S. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. ;
Chatman, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1094-1110
[3]  
Ashford SJ, 2009, VOICE AND SILENCE IN ORGANIZATIONS, P175
[4]   SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY AND THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
MAEL, F .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :20-39
[5]   THE EXPERIENCE OF POWERLESSNESS IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
ASHFORTH, BE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1989, 43 (02) :207-242
[6]   Disentangling the effects of voice:: The incremental roles of opportunity, behavior, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness [J].
Avery, DR ;
Quiñones, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :81-86
[7]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[8]   Firefighters, critical incidents, and drinking to cope: The adequacy of unit-level performance resources as a source of vulnerability and protection [J].
Bacharach, Samuel B. ;
Bamberger, Peter A. ;
Doveh, Etti .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (01) :155-169
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. ;
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Gil, Karen M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (02) :142-163