The impact on Uganda of agricultural trade liberalisation

被引:7
作者
Blake, A [1 ]
McKay, A [1 ]
Morrissey, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00026.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 [应用经济学]; 020205 [产业经济学]; 1203 [农林经济管理];
摘要
This paper evaluates the impact on Uganda of the liberalisation of world trade, especially in agricultural commodities, as proposed in the Uruguay Round, and of unilateral liberalisation of Uganda's own import tariffs. A CGE model of Uganda is used to model the effects of trade liberalisation, taking into account the distribution effects by household types. We can draw three broad conclusions. First, the impact of multilateral liberalisation on a low-income country such as Uganda appears to be quite slight, albeit positive, largely because there is only a slight impact on the world prices of the agricultural commodities it exports. Second, the principal gains actually arise from trade reforms that are essentially unilateral in nature. Third, the impact is likely to be pro-poor. Although the largest proportional gains are to the urban self-employed, there are significant gains in agriculture that benefit almost all categories of rural household.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 381
页数:17
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
APPLETON S, 1998, 9815 CSAE U OXF
[2]
Blake AT, 1999, J AGR ECON, V50, P400, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00890.x
[3]
BRANDAO, 1993, UNPUB IMPLICATIONS A
[4]
Goldin I., 1990, AGR TRADE LIBERALIZA
[5]
Martin Will., 1996, The Uruguay Round and Developing Countries
[6]
McKay A., 1997, European Journal of Development Research, V9, P129, DOI [10.1080/09578819708426693, DOI 10.1080/09578819708426693]
[7]
MORRISSEY O, 1998, 9812 CREDIT
[8]
Sharer RobertL., 1995, 121 INT MON FUND
[9]
*UNCTAD, 1990, UN PUBL
[10]
Vaillant C., 1999, J INT TRADE ECON DEV, V8, P107, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09638199900000008, 10.1080/09638199900000008]