From uncertain intentions to actual behavior: A threshold model of whether and when salespeople quit

被引:51
作者
Chandrashekaran, M [1 ]
McNeilly, K
Russ, FA
Marinova, D
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Business Adm, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Miami Univ, Richard T Farmer Sch Business, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Weatherhead Sch Management, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.37.4.463.18793
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, the authors focus on the formation of intentions to quit among salespeople and the link between these intentions and subsequent quitting behavior. Building on the foundations of the recently developed judgment uncertainty and magnitude parameters (JUMP) model, which statistically and simultaneously separates the drivers of judgment magnitude from those of judgment uncertainty, the authors present a model of the formation of uncertain intentions that decomposes a stated intention into a magnitude and an uncertainty dimension. The authors then develop hypotheses regarding the impact of affective and continuance commitment and critical sales events on intention magnitude and the effect of critical sales events and role stress on intention uncertainty. Subsequently, the authors develop a threshold model of the intention behavior link that articulates;a psychological mechanism within which uncertainty-laden intentions translate into actual behavior. Empirically, results from sales force intention and turnover data provide strong support for the theorizing. In addition to identifying some drivers of intention-to-quit magnitude and uncertainty, the authors identify the crucial role of intention uncertainty in shaping both the probability and timing of subsequent behavior. Consistent with the psychological underpinnings of the threshold model, the authors find that intention uncertainty lowers the probability of intended behavior. The results regarding the timing of quitting support an uncertainty avoidance conjecture: Given a stated intention, likely quitters with greater intention uncertainty quit faster than those with lower intention uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 479
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MARKET LETT, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00993902
[3]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[4]   A UNIFIED MODEL OF TURNOVER FROM ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BLUEDORN, AC .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1982, 35 (02) :135-153
[5]  
BLUNDELL R, 1987, ECON J, V97, P44, DOI 10.2307/3038229
[6]   A dynamic model of the duration of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction [J].
Bolton, RN .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :45-65
[7]   ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF SALESPERSON JOB-SATISFACTION - METAANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF CAUSAL EFFECTS [J].
BROWN, SP ;
PETERSON, RA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1993, 30 (01) :63-77
[8]   ISOLATING THE DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVENESS - A SPLIT-POPULATION TOBIT (SPOT) DURATION MODEL OF TIMING AND VOLUME OF FIRST AND REPEAT PURCHASE [J].
CHANDRASHEKARAN, M ;
SINHA, RK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) :444-456
[9]  
CHANDRASHEKARAN M, 1998, COVER ANAL OVERT RES
[10]  
DARDEN WR, 1987, J RETAILING, V63, P69