Why Are Some Salespeople Better at Adapting to Organizational Change?

被引:99
作者
Ahearne, Michael [1 ]
Lam, Son K. [2 ]
Mathieu, John E. [3 ]
Bolander, Willy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, CT Bauer Coll Business, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Sch Business, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
salesperson; organizational change; adaptation to change; goal orientation; growth modeling; GOAL ORIENTATION; LEARNING ORIENTATION; SALESPERSON PERFORMANCE; JOB-PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; MODELS; IMPLEMENTATION; CAPABILITIES; PERSONALITY; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.74.3.65
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study empirically examines the longitudinal influences of salesperson goal orientations on performance trajectories during a planned change intervention that requires learning to answer two questions. First, what is the functional form of salespeople's performance trajectories during a period of change implementation? Second, why are some salespeople better at adapting to change than others? Polynomial growth models show that the average salesperson performance trajectory displays an initial decline, gradual recovery, and eventual restabilization. Salesperson learning orientation is related positively to larger initial declines, steeper recovery slopes, and higher restabilization levels. In contrast, performance orientation is related positively to smaller initial declines, but shallower recovery slopes and lower restabilization levels. The results suggest that successful implementation of planned change interventions largely depends on identifying and appreciating the heterogeneity of individual traits that share meaning with the change. The study has implications on what sales managers should expect in terms of performance losses and gains during change and how managers can predict which salespeople will reap the largest performance benefits from a change intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 79
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms [J].
Ahearne, Michael ;
Jones, Eli ;
Rapp, Adam ;
Mathieu, John .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (04) :671-685
[2]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]   Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s [J].
Armenakis, AA ;
Bedeian, AG .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1999, 25 (03) :293-315
[4]  
BAILOR C, 2007, CRM MAGAZINE, V11, P16
[5]   The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance [J].
Baker, WE ;
Sinkula, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 27 (04) :411-427
[6]   AUTONOMY AS A MODERATOR OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :111-118
[7]  
BEER M, 1987, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V38, P339, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.339
[8]   Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations [J].
Bliese, PD ;
Ployhart, RE .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2002, 5 (04) :362-387
[9]   A customer relationship management roadmap: What is known, potential pitfalls, and where to go [J].
Boulding, W ;
Staelin, R ;
Ehret, M ;
Johnston, WJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :155-166
[10]  
Bray DW., 1994, DIAGNOSIS ORG CHANGE, P152