Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review

被引:130
作者
Geyh, S.
Cieza, A.
Kollerits, B.
Grimby, G.
Stucki, G.
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, ICF Res Branch, WHO FIC Collaborating Ctr DIMDI, IHRS, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Swiss Parapleg Res, Nottwil, Switzerland
关键词
cerebrovascular disorders; stroke; outcome assessment; health status; quality of life; ICF;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-007-9174-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To examine and compare the contents of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures used in stroke, based on the ICF as the frame of reference. Design We conducted a systematic literature review to select current generic and condition-specific HRQoL measures applied in stroke. We examined the contents of the selected measures by linking the concepts within the instruments' items to the ICF. Results The systematic literature review resulted in the selection of six generic and seven stroke-specific HRQoL measures. Within the selected instruments we identified 979 concepts. To map these concepts, we used 200 different ICF categories. None of the ICF categories is contained in all of the instruments. The most frequently used category is 'b152 Emotional functions' contained in 53 items from 10 instruments. Stroke-specific measures more often address 'Mental functions', while the selected generic instruments more often include Environmental Factors. Discussion The present study provides an overview on current HRQoL measures in stroke with respect to their covered contents and provides valuable information to facilitate the selection of appropriate instruments for specific purposes in clinical as well as research settings.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 851
页数:19
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 [J].
Acquadro, C ;
Berzon, R ;
Dubois, D ;
Leidy, NK ;
Marquis, P ;
Revicki, D ;
Rothman, M .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) :522-531
[3]   Validation of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients [J].
Anderson, C ;
Laubscher, S ;
Burns, R .
STROKE, 1996, 27 (10) :1812-1816
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SAS SYST WIND VERS 8
[5]   Issues in Selecting Outcome Measures to Assess Functional Recovery After Stroke [J].
Barak S. ;
Duncan P.W. .
NeuroRX, 2006, 3 (4) :505-524
[6]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[7]  
Bilbao A, 2003, NEUROREHABILITATION, V18, P239
[8]   The ICF categories identified in nursing interventions administered to neurological patients with post-acute rehabilitation needs [J].
Boldt, C ;
Brach, M ;
Grill, E ;
Berthou, A ;
Meister, K ;
Scheuringer, M ;
Stucki, G .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 27 (7-8) :431-436
[9]  
BORCHERS M, 2004, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V14, P139
[10]  
Bowling A, 1995, Measuring disease: A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales