Shared decision making: ein Oberblicksartikel bber die internationale Forschungsliteratur

被引:74
作者
Scheibler, F [1 ]
Janssen, C [1 ]
Pfaff, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Inst Poliklin & Arbeits & Sozialmed, Med Soziol Abt, D-5000 Cologne 41, Germany
来源
SOZIAL-UND PRAVENTIVMEDIZIN | 2003年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
shared decision making; patient participation; physician-patient relations; methods;
D O I
10.1007/s000380300002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Shared decision making (SDM) is a particular type of physician-patient-interaction to which the patient brings his/her individual preferences and the physician contributes the medical expertise. The aim of the SDM process is a treatment decision based on mutual agreement and active participation. This kind of decision-making is best effectuated in cases of diseases with medical uncertainty and/or differing patient outcome-treatment potentialities (e.g., breast- or prostate cancer). The concept of SDM is widely known in the English-speaking world. A database search with the keywords "shared decision" produced 301 relevant papers, of which 193 are theoretical and 108 empirical works. This paper gives an overview over the state of international research under special consideration in continental European literature. Different questions are explored with regard to potential methodological and contextual research fields. Present results indicate that the level of patient preference to participate in decisions is higher than their actual involvement. Results also prove that SDM leads to higher rates of satisfaction and better treatment results according to patients. Results regarding the efficacy of various intervention methods used to promote SDM, especially within different cultural contexts, are inconsistent. A great amount of research still needs to be done in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Regular view - Management of spontaneous miscarriage in the first trimester: an example of putting informed shared decision making into practice [J].
Ankum, WM ;
Wieringa-de Waard, M ;
Bindels, PJE .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7298) :1343-1346
[2]  
BADURA B, 1999, BURGERORIENTIERUNG G
[3]   End-of-life decisions in adult intensive care: Current research base and directions for the future [J].
Baggs, JG ;
Schmitt, MH .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2000, 48 (04) :158-164
[4]  
BECK A, 2000, AHSR FHSR ANN M ABST, V11, P9412
[5]   PATIENT INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIORS WHEN COMMUNICATING WITH DOCTORS [J].
BEISECKER, AE ;
BEISECKER, TD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (01) :19-28
[6]  
BERSTEIN S, 1998, ANN M INT SOC TECH A, V14, P9812
[7]  
Brady Teresa J., 1998, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, V10, P146, DOI 10.1097/00002281-199803000-00011
[8]  
Brock D W, 1991, Kennedy Inst Ethics J, V1, P28
[9]   WHEN COMPETENT PATIENTS MAKE IRRATIONAL CHOICES [J].
BROCK, DW ;
WARTMAN, SA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (22) :1595-1599
[10]   THE PATIENTS ROLE IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING [J].
BRODY, DS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 93 (05) :718-722