Simulation of the new product development process for performance improvement

被引:74
作者
Bhuiyan, N
Gerwin, D
Thomson, V
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Eric Sprott Sch Business, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Engn Mech, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
new product development; concurrent engineering; sequential engineering; stochastic simulation; overlapping; cross-functional teams;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1040.0309
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the linkages between key features of the new product development (NPD) process and NPD performance and suggests ways of designing the process to improve performance. Using a stochastic computer model, we examine, under varying uncertainty conditions, how the key features of overlapping and functional interaction affect the performance measures of development time and effort (total person-days for a project). Findings indicate that, first and foremost, whether or not overlapping occurs, increasing functional interaction eventually leads to a trade-off between development time and effort. Second, an "early-start-in-the-dark" approach of increasing overlapping with no functional interaction is inferior even to an "over-the-wall" approach. Third, increasing overlapping when some functional interaction exists is beneficial in low uncertainty and harmful in high uncertainty Fourth, concurrent engineering (CE) is appropriate under low uncertainty, while a type of sequential engineering (SE), different than the "over-the-wall" approach, should be used under high uncertainty, and last, dedicated teams are suitable under high, and not low, uncertainty. We developed the model with the aid of a company and validated it against a published account of five case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1703
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   IS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING ALWAYS A SENSIBLE PROPOSITION [J].
AITSAHLIA, F ;
JOHNSON, E ;
WILL, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1995, 42 (02) :166-170
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, VALIDATING COMPUTATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, TOTAL QUALITY DEV
[4]  
Banks J., 2001, Discrete-event system simulation, V3rd
[5]  
BHUIYAN N, 2001, THESIS MCGILL U MONT
[6]  
Burtt BL, 1995, Gesneriana, V1, P1
[7]  
Clark K.B., 1991, PRODUCT DEV PERFORMA
[8]   PERSPECTIVE - 3RD-GENERATION NEW PRODUCT PROCESSES [J].
COOPER, RG .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1994, 11 (01) :3-14
[9]   DETERMINANTS OF TIMELINESS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT [J].
COOPER, RG ;
KLEINSCHMIDT, EJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1994, 11 (05) :381-396
[10]   New product development structures and time-to-market [J].
Datar, S ;
Jordan, C ;
Kekre, S ;
Rajiv, S ;
Srinivasan, K .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (04) :452-464