The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference

被引:131
作者
Matthiopoulos, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, NERC, Sea Mammal Res Unit, Gatty Marine Lab, St Andrews KY16 8LB, Fife, Scotland
关键词
accessibility restrictions; central-place foragers; home range; grey seals (Halichoerus grypus); habitat preference; habitat availability; models of animal movement; spatial usage;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00293-4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Heterogeneous usage of space by individual animals or animal populations is partly due to their preference for particular resources that are, themselves. heterogeneously distributed. When all points in the environment are equally accessible, a direct relationship between usage and preference can be assumed. However, when accessibility is restricted, spatial variations in usage can no longer be attributed entirely to preference. In such cases, it is necessary to control for the effects of accessibility on observed usage before conclusions about preference can be drawn. In this paper, I develop a modelling framework that treats the use of space by animals as a joint function of preference and accessibility. I specify a null version of the framework that assumes no preference and propose that its output can be used to control for the effect of accessibility on the observed, spatial distribution of usage. I briefly discuss how the framework can subsequently be used to provide insights about the animals' preference for different resources and types of movement, and to predict usage in areas where no usage data exist. I explore the properties of the methodology using data from a population of simulated animals and present the first results of its application to a sub-set of the British population of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 268
页数:30
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
ANDREASSEN HP, 1993, BIOL LEMMINGS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, FRACTAL GEOMETRY
[3]   Assessing habitat selection when availability changes [J].
Arthur, SM ;
Manly, BFJ ;
McDonald, LL ;
Garner, GW .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) :215-227
[4]   An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife [J].
Augustin, NH ;
Mugglestone, MA ;
Buckland, ST .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1996, 33 (02) :339-347
[5]   DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF RAPTORS IN RELATION TO DENSITY OF MEADOW VOLES [J].
BAKER, JA ;
BROOKS, RJ .
CONDOR, 1981, 83 (01) :42-47
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF HIGH-QUALITY FOOD ON HABITAT USE BY ARCTIC MICROTINE RODENTS [J].
BATZLI, GO ;
LESIEUTRE, C .
OIKOS, 1991, 60 (03) :299-306
[7]  
Bell W. J., 1991, Searching behaviour: the behavioural ecology of finding resources.
[8]   DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN ELEMENTARY ORIENTATION MECHANISMS BY MEANS OF PATH-ANALYSIS [J].
BENHAMOU, S ;
BOVET, P .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1992, 43 (03) :371-377
[9]   A MODEL FOR PLACE NAVIGATION IN MAMMALS [J].
BENHAMOU, S ;
BOVET, P ;
POUCET, B .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1995, 173 (02) :163-178
[10]   INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT [J].
BERNSTEIN, C ;
KACELNIK, A ;
KREBS, JR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 57 (03) :1007-1026