Mu (μ) opioid receptor regulation of ethanol-induced dopamine response in the ventral striatum:: Evidence of genotype specific sexual dimorphic epistasis

被引:34
作者
Job, Martin O.
Tang, Amanda
Hall, F. Scott
Sora, Ichiro
Uhl, George R.
Bergeson, Susan E.
Gonzales, Rueben A.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Coll Pharm, Div Pharmacol, PHAR Pharmacol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Waggoner Ctr Alcohol & Addict Res, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] NIDA, Mol Neurobiol Branch, Intramural Res Program, NIH, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Texas, Neurobiol Sect, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Univ Texas, Sect Mol Genet & Microbiol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
dopamine; genotype; knockout mice; microdialysis; nucleus accumbens; sexual dimorphism;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.016
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Background: Ethanol stimulates the dopaminergic mesoaccumbal pathway, which is thought to play a role in ethanol reinforcement. Mu (mu)-opioid (MOP) receptors modulate accumbal dopamine activity, but it is not clear whether MOP receptors are involved in the mechanism of ethanol-stimulated accumbal dopamine release. Methods: We investigated the role that MOP receptors play in ethanol (2.0 g/kg)-stimulated accumbal dopamine release by using MOP receptor knockout mice (C57BL/6J-1 29SvEv and congenic C57BL/6J genotypes) along with blockade of MOP receptors with a mu 1 selective antagonist (naloxonazine). Results: Both gene deletion and pharmacological antagonism of the MOP receptor decreased ethanol-stimulated accumbal dopamine release compared with controls with female mice showing a larger effect in the C57BL/6J-129SvEv genotype. However, both male and female mice showed reduced ethanol-stimulated dopamine release in the congenic MOP receptor knockout mice (C57BL/6J). No differences in the time course of dialysate ethanol concentration were found in any of the experiments. Conclusions: The data demonstrate the existence of a novel interaction between genotype and sex in the regulation of ethanol-stimulated mesolimbic dopamine release by the MOP receptor. This implies that a more complete understanding of the epistatic influences on the MOP receptor and mesolimbic dopamine function may provide more effective pharmacotherapeutic interventions in the treatment of alcoholism.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 634
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]
SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF MORPHINE AND STRESS ON VISCERAL PAIN [J].
BAAMONDE, AI ;
HIDALGO, A ;
ANDRESTRELLES, F .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 28 (09) :967-970
[2]
Bartok RE, 1997, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V282, P769
[3]
Rewarding effects of ethanol and cocaine in μ opioid receptor-deficient mice [J].
Becker, A ;
Grecksch, G ;
Kraus, J ;
Loh, HH ;
Schroeder, H ;
Höllt, V .
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 365 (04) :296-302
[4]
VOLUNTARY CONSUMPTION OF ETHANOL IN 15 INBRED MOUSE STRAINS [J].
BELKNAP, JK ;
CRABBE, JC ;
YOUNG, ER .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 112 (04) :503-510
[5]
Involvement of mu- and delta-opioid receptors in the effects of systemic and locally perfused morphine on extracellular levels of dopamine, DOPAC and HVA in the nucleus accumbens of the halothane-anaesthetized rat [J].
Borg, PJ ;
Taylor, DA .
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 355 (05) :582-588
[6]
Dopamine D3 receptor knockout mice and the motivational effects of ethanol [J].
Boyce-Rustay, JM ;
Risinger, FO .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 75 (02) :373-379
[7]
Why sex matters for neuroscience [J].
Cahill, Larry .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 7 (06) :477-484
[8]
Efficacy and safety of naltrexone and acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence:: a systematic review [J].
Carmen, B ;
Angeles, M ;
Ana, M ;
María, AJ .
ADDICTION, 2004, 99 (07) :811-828
[9]
Basal and morphine-evoked dopaminergic neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens of MOR- and DOR-knockout mice [J].
Chefer, VI ;
Kieffer, BL ;
Shippenberg, TS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 18 (07) :1915-1922
[10]
Gender differences in the reinforcing properties of morphine [J].
Cicero, TJ ;
Ennis, T ;
Ogden, J ;
Meyer, ER .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 65 (01) :91-96