Robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an assessment of its. contemporary role in the surgical management of localized prostate cancer

被引:40
作者
Smith, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Radical prostatectomy has maintained a cardinal role in the treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate. The combination of refinements in surgical technique and better definition of the anatomy have decreased the morbidity from surgery. Nonetheless, concerns about treatment-related side effects remain the primary limitation of surgical therapy for prostate cancer. Laparoscopic prostatectomy, with or without robotic assistance, is playing an increasing role in surgical treatment of prostate cancer. However, the minimally invasive aspect of laparoscopy may have less relevance for radical prostatectomy because the open surgical procedure requires a limited infraumbilical incision. In the present series comparing robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with open radical retropubic prostatectomy, no difference was seen in postoperative pain, length of stay, or requirement for blood replacement. However, the most important outcome measures are tumor control, continence, and sexual potency. The outstanding visibility and precision afforded by the robotic approach may offer advantages in each of these areas. (C) 2004 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63S / 67S
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy in patients at high anesthetic risk [J].
Baldwin, DD ;
Dunbar, JA ;
Parekh, DJ ;
Wells, N ;
Shuford, MD ;
Cookson, MS ;
Smith, JA ;
Herrell, SD ;
Chang, SS ;
McDougall, EM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (03) :161-167
[2]   Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, JM ;
Martin, SK ;
Amling, CL ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :733-739
[3]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[4]   Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Riedel, E ;
Begg, CB ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Gerigk, C ;
Gonen, M ;
Reuter, V ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2292-2295
[5]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
El-Fettouh, H ;
Baumert, H ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Doublet, JD ;
Fromont, G ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) :1261-1266
[6]   Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation [J].
Katz, R ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
de la Taille, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Abbou, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) :2049-2052
[7]   Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: Is preoperative autologous blood donation indicated? [J].
Koch, MO ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) :1077-1079
[8]   PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF A COST-EFFICIENT PROGRAM FOR RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
KOCH, MO ;
SMITH, JA ;
HODGE, EM ;
BRANDELL, RA .
UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (03) :311-318
[9]   Low molecular weight heparin and radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis of safety and side effects [J].
Koch, MO ;
Smith, JA .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 1997, 1 (02) :101-104
[10]   Comparison of hand assisted and standard laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized transitional cell carcinoma [J].
Landman, J ;
Lev, RY ;
Bhayani, S ;
Alberts, G ;
Rehman, J ;
Pattaras, JG ;
Figenshau, RS ;
Kibel, AS ;
Clayman, RV ;
McDougall, EM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) :2387-2391